dcb8911316
Explicit specialization doesn't increase depth of template parameters,
so need to be careful when gathering template parameters for
instantiation.
For the case:
```
template<typename T>
struct X {
struct impl;
};
template <>
struct X<int>::impl {
template<int ct>
int f() { return ct; };
};
```
instantiation of `f` used to crash because type template parameter
`int` of explicit specialization was taken into account, but non-type
template parameter `ct` had zero depth and index so wrong parameter
ended up inside of a wrong handler.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/61159
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155705
40 lines
811 B
C++
40 lines
811 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++20 %s
|
|
// expected-no-diagnostics
|
|
|
|
namespace GH61159 {
|
|
template <typename T> struct X {
|
|
struct I;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <> struct X<int>::I {
|
|
template <int ct> constexpr int f() { return ct; };
|
|
|
|
int data = 3;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <typename T> struct X<T>::I {
|
|
template <T ct> constexpr T f() { return ct + 1; };
|
|
T data = 7;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static_assert(X<int>::I{}.f<17>() == 17);
|
|
static_assert(X<int>::I{}.data == 3);
|
|
static_assert(X<short>::I{}.data == 7);
|
|
static_assert(X<short>::I{}.f<18>() == 19);
|
|
|
|
template <typename T> struct Y {
|
|
struct I;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <> struct Y<int> {
|
|
struct I {
|
|
template <int ct> constexpr int f() { return ct; };
|
|
int data = 3;
|
|
};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static_assert(Y<int>::I{}.f<17>() == 17);
|
|
static_assert(Y<int>::I{}.data == 3);
|
|
|
|
} // namespace GH61159
|