Files
clang-p2996/lldb/test/API/lang/cpp/bitfields/main.cpp
shafik 00c8120acb [LLDB] Fix handling of bit-fields when there is a base class when parsing DWARF
When parsing DWARF and laying out bit-fields we currently don't take into account whether we have a base class or not.
Currently if the first field is a bit-field but the bit offset is due a field we inherit from a base class we currently
treat it as an unnamed bit-field and therefore add an extra field.

This fix will not check if we have a base class and assume that this offset is due to members we are inheriting from the base.
We are currently seeing asserts during codegen when debugging clang::DiagnosticOptions.

This assumption will fail in the case where the first field in the derived class in an unnamed bit-field. Fixing the first field
being an unnamed bit-field looks like it will require a larger change since we will need a way to track or discover the last field offset of the bases(s).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76808
2020-03-27 11:28:07 -07:00

94 lines
1.5 KiB
C++

#include <stdint.h>
int main(int argc, char const *argv[]) {
struct LargeBitsA {
unsigned int : 30, a : 20;
} lba;
struct LargeBitsB {
unsigned int a : 1, : 11, : 12, b : 20;
} lbb;
struct LargeBitsC {
unsigned int : 13, : 9, a : 1, b : 1, c : 5, d : 1, e : 20;
} lbc;
struct LargeBitsD {
char arr[3];
unsigned int : 30, a : 20;
} lbd;
// This case came up when debugging clang and models RecordDeclBits
struct BitExampleFromClangDeclContext {
class fields {
uint64_t : 13;
uint64_t : 9;
uint64_t a: 1;
uint64_t b: 1;
uint64_t c: 1;
uint64_t d: 1;
uint64_t e: 1;
uint64_t f: 1;
uint64_t g: 1;
uint64_t h: 1;
uint64_t i: 1;
uint64_t j: 1;
uint64_t k: 1;
// In order to reproduce the crash for this case we need the
// members of fields to stay private :-(
friend struct BitExampleFromClangDeclContext;
};
union {
struct fields f;
};
BitExampleFromClangDeclContext() {
f.a = 1;
f.b = 0;
f.c = 1;
f.d = 0;
f.e = 1;
f.f = 0;
f.g = 1;
f.h = 0;
f.i = 1;
f.j = 0;
f.k = 1;
}
} clang_example;
class B {
public:
uint32_t b_a;
};
class D : public B {
public:
uint32_t d_a : 1;
} derived;
lba.a = 2;
lbb.a = 1;
lbb.b = 3;
lbc.a = 1;
lbc.b = 0;
lbc.c = 4;
lbc.d = 1;
lbc.e = 20;
lbd.arr[0] = 'a';
lbd.arr[1] = 'b';
lbd.arr[2] = '\0';
lbd.a = 5;
derived.b_a = 2;
derived.d_a = 1;
return 0; // Set break point at this line.
}