This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
169 lines
6.0 KiB
C++
169 lines
6.0 KiB
C++
//===-- ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint.cpp ------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
|
|
//
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
//
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "lldb/Target/ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint.h"
|
|
|
|
// C Includes
|
|
// C++ Includes
|
|
// Other libraries and framework includes
|
|
// Project includes
|
|
#include "lldb/Target/Process.h"
|
|
#include "lldb/Target/RegisterContext.h"
|
|
#include "lldb/Utility/Log.h"
|
|
#include "lldb/Utility/Stream.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace lldb;
|
|
using namespace lldb_private;
|
|
|
|
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint: Single steps over a breakpoint bp_site_sp at
|
|
// the pc.
|
|
//----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint(Thread &thread)
|
|
: ThreadPlan(
|
|
ThreadPlan::eKindStepOverBreakpoint, "Step over breakpoint trap",
|
|
thread, eVoteNo,
|
|
eVoteNoOpinion), // We need to report the run since this happens
|
|
// first in the thread plan stack when stepping over
|
|
// a breakpoint
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr(LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS),
|
|
m_auto_continue(false), m_reenabled_breakpoint_site(false)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr = m_thread.GetRegisterContext()->GetPC();
|
|
m_breakpoint_site_id =
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->GetBreakpointSiteList().FindIDByAddress(
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::~ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint() {}
|
|
|
|
void ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::GetDescription(
|
|
Stream *s, lldb::DescriptionLevel level) {
|
|
s->Printf("Single stepping past breakpoint site %" PRIu64 " at 0x%" PRIx64,
|
|
m_breakpoint_site_id, (uint64_t)m_breakpoint_addr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ValidatePlan(Stream *error) { return true; }
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::DoPlanExplainsStop(Event *event_ptr) {
|
|
StopInfoSP stop_info_sp = GetPrivateStopInfo();
|
|
if (stop_info_sp) {
|
|
// It's a little surprising that we stop here for a breakpoint hit.
|
|
// However, when you single step ONTO a breakpoint we still want to call
|
|
// that a breakpoint hit, and trigger the actions, etc. Otherwise you
|
|
// would see the
|
|
// PC at the breakpoint without having triggered the actions, then you'd
|
|
// continue, the PC wouldn't change,
|
|
// and you'd see the breakpoint hit, which would be odd. So the lower
|
|
// levels fake "step onto breakpoint address" and return that as a
|
|
// breakpoint. So our trace step COULD appear as a breakpoint hit if the
|
|
// next instruction also contained a breakpoint.
|
|
StopReason reason = stop_info_sp->GetStopReason();
|
|
|
|
switch (reason) {
|
|
case eStopReasonTrace:
|
|
case eStopReasonNone:
|
|
return true;
|
|
case eStopReasonBreakpoint:
|
|
// It's a little surprising that we stop here for a breakpoint hit.
|
|
// However, when you single step ONTO a breakpoint we still want to call
|
|
// that a breakpoint hit, and trigger the actions, etc. Otherwise you
|
|
// would see the PC at the breakpoint without having triggered the
|
|
// actions, then you'd continue, the PC wouldn't change, and you'd see
|
|
// the breakpoint hit, which would be odd. So the lower levels fake "step
|
|
// onto breakpoint address" and return that as a breakpoint hit. So our
|
|
// trace step COULD appear as a breakpoint hit if the next instruction
|
|
// also contained a breakpoint. We don't want to handle that, since we
|
|
// really don't know what to do with breakpoint hits. But make sure we
|
|
// don't set ourselves to auto-continue or we'll wrench control away from
|
|
// the plans that can deal with this.
|
|
SetAutoContinue(false);
|
|
return false;
|
|
default:
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ShouldStop(Event *event_ptr) {
|
|
return !ShouldAutoContinue(event_ptr);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::StopOthers() { return true; }
|
|
|
|
StateType ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::GetPlanRunState() {
|
|
return eStateStepping;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::DoWillResume(StateType resume_state,
|
|
bool current_plan) {
|
|
if (current_plan) {
|
|
BreakpointSiteSP bp_site_sp(
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->GetBreakpointSiteList().FindByAddress(
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr));
|
|
if (bp_site_sp && bp_site_sp->IsEnabled())
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->DisableBreakpointSite(bp_site_sp.get());
|
|
}
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::WillStop() {
|
|
ReenableBreakpointSite();
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::MischiefManaged() {
|
|
lldb::addr_t pc_addr = m_thread.GetRegisterContext()->GetPC();
|
|
|
|
if (pc_addr == m_breakpoint_addr) {
|
|
// If we are still at the PC of our breakpoint, then for some reason we
|
|
// didn't get a chance to run.
|
|
return false;
|
|
} else {
|
|
Log *log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_STEP));
|
|
if (log)
|
|
log->Printf("Completed step over breakpoint plan.");
|
|
// Otherwise, re-enable the breakpoint we were stepping over, and we're
|
|
// done.
|
|
ReenableBreakpointSite();
|
|
ThreadPlan::MischiefManaged();
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ReenableBreakpointSite() {
|
|
if (!m_reenabled_breakpoint_site) {
|
|
m_reenabled_breakpoint_site = true;
|
|
BreakpointSiteSP bp_site_sp(
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->GetBreakpointSiteList().FindByAddress(
|
|
m_breakpoint_addr));
|
|
if (bp_site_sp) {
|
|
m_thread.GetProcess()->EnableBreakpointSite(bp_site_sp.get());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
void ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ThreadDestroyed() {
|
|
ReenableBreakpointSite();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::SetAutoContinue(bool do_it) {
|
|
m_auto_continue = do_it;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::ShouldAutoContinue(Event *event_ptr) {
|
|
return m_auto_continue;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool ThreadPlanStepOverBreakpoint::IsPlanStale() {
|
|
return m_thread.GetRegisterContext()->GetPC() != m_breakpoint_addr;
|
|
}
|