Currently IRCE relies on the loops it transforms to be (semantically) of
the form:
for (i = START; i < END; i++)
...
or
for (i = START; i > END; i--)
...
However, we were not verifying the presence of the START < END entry
check (i.e. check before the first iteration). We were only verifying
that the backedge was guarded by (i + 1) < END.
Usually this would work "fine" since (especially in Java) most loops do
actually have the START < END check, but of course that is not
guaranteed.
llvm-svn: 294375
46 lines
1.0 KiB
LLVM
46 lines
1.0 KiB
LLVM
; RUN: opt -S -irce -irce-print-changed-loops=true < %s | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
; CHECK-NOT: irce
|
|
|
|
define void @bad_loop_structure_increasing(i64 %iv.start) {
|
|
entry:
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
for.body:
|
|
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %iv.start, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.inc ]
|
|
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %indvars.iv, 100
|
|
br i1 %cmp, label %switch.lookup, label %for.inc
|
|
|
|
switch.lookup:
|
|
br label %for.inc
|
|
|
|
for.inc:
|
|
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
|
|
%cmp55 = icmp slt i64 %indvars.iv.next, 11
|
|
br i1 %cmp55, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
|
|
|
for.end:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define void @bad_loop_structure_decreasing(i64 %iv.start) {
|
|
entry:
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
for.body:
|
|
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %iv.start, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.inc ]
|
|
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %indvars.iv, 100
|
|
br i1 %cmp, label %switch.lookup, label %for.inc
|
|
|
|
switch.lookup:
|
|
br label %for.inc
|
|
|
|
for.inc:
|
|
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1
|
|
%cmp55 = icmp sgt i64 %indvars.iv.next, 11
|
|
br i1 %cmp55, label %for.body, label %for.end
|
|
|
|
for.end:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|