Files
clang-p2996/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/NumberObjectConversionChecker.cpp
Kristof Umann 0a1f91c80c [analyzer] Restrict AnalyzerOptions' interface so that non-checker objects have to be registered
One of the reasons why AnalyzerOptions is so chaotic is that options can be
retrieved from the command line whenever and wherever. This allowed for some
options to be forgotten for a looooooong time. Have you ever heard of
"region-store-small-struct-limit"? In order to prevent this in the future, I'm
proposing to restrict AnalyzerOptions' interface so that only checker options
can be retrieved without special getters. I would like to make every option be
accessible only through a getter, but checkers from plugins are a thing, so I'll
have to figure something out for that.

This also forces developers who'd like to add a new option to register it
properly in the .def file.

This is done by

* making the third checker pointer parameter non-optional, and checked by an
  assert to be non-null.
* I added new, but private non-checkers option initializers, meant only for
  internal use,
* Renamed these methods accordingly (mind the consistent name for once with
  getBooleanOption!):
  - getOptionAsString -> getCheckerStringOption,
  - getOptionAsInteger -> getCheckerIntegerOption
* The 3 functions meant for initializing data members (with the not very
  descriptive getBooleanOption, getOptionAsString and getOptionAsUInt names)
  were renamed to be overloads of the getAndInitOption function name.
* All options were in some way retrieved via getCheckerOption. I removed it, and
  moved the logic to getStringOption and getCheckerStringOption. This did cause
  some code duplication, but that's the only way I could do it, now that checker
  and non-checker options are separated. Note that the non-checker version
  inserts the new option to the ConfigTable with the default value, but the
  checker version only attempts to find already existing entries. This is how
  it always worked, but this is clunky and I might end reworking that too, so we
  can eventually get a ConfigTable that contains the entire configuration of the
  analyzer.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53483

llvm-svn: 346113
2018-11-05 03:50:37 +00:00

351 lines
13 KiB
C++

//===- NumberObjectConversionChecker.cpp -------------------------*- C++ -*-==//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file defines NumberObjectConversionChecker, which checks for a
// particular common mistake when dealing with numbers represented as objects
// passed around by pointers. Namely, the language allows to reinterpret the
// pointer as a number directly, often without throwing any warnings,
// but in most cases the result of such conversion is clearly unexpected,
// as pointer value, rather than number value represented by the pointee object,
// becomes the result of such operation.
//
// Currently the checker supports the Objective-C NSNumber class,
// and the OSBoolean class found in macOS low-level code; the latter
// can only hold boolean values.
//
// This checker has an option "Pedantic" (boolean), which enables detection of
// more conversion patterns (which are most likely more harmless, and therefore
// are more likely to produce false positives) - disabled by default,
// enabled with `-analyzer-config osx.NumberObjectConversion:Pedantic=true'.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "ClangSACheckers.h"
#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugReporter.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter/BugType.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/Checker.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/AnalysisManager.h"
#include "clang/Lex/Lexer.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/APSInt.h"
using namespace clang;
using namespace ento;
using namespace ast_matchers;
namespace {
class NumberObjectConversionChecker : public Checker<check::ASTCodeBody> {
public:
bool Pedantic;
void checkASTCodeBody(const Decl *D, AnalysisManager &AM,
BugReporter &BR) const;
};
class Callback : public MatchFinder::MatchCallback {
const NumberObjectConversionChecker *C;
BugReporter &BR;
AnalysisDeclContext *ADC;
public:
Callback(const NumberObjectConversionChecker *C,
BugReporter &BR, AnalysisDeclContext *ADC)
: C(C), BR(BR), ADC(ADC) {}
virtual void run(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result);
};
} // end of anonymous namespace
void Callback::run(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
bool IsPedanticMatch =
(Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Stmt>("pedantic") != nullptr);
if (IsPedanticMatch && !C->Pedantic)
return;
ASTContext &ACtx = ADC->getASTContext();
if (const Expr *CheckIfNull =
Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Expr>("check_if_null")) {
// Unless the macro indicates that the intended type is clearly not
// a pointer type, we should avoid warning on comparing pointers
// to zero literals in non-pedantic mode.
// FIXME: Introduce an AST matcher to implement the macro-related logic?
bool MacroIndicatesWeShouldSkipTheCheck = false;
SourceLocation Loc = CheckIfNull->getBeginLoc();
if (Loc.isMacroID()) {
StringRef MacroName = Lexer::getImmediateMacroName(
Loc, ACtx.getSourceManager(), ACtx.getLangOpts());
if (MacroName == "NULL" || MacroName == "nil")
return;
if (MacroName == "YES" || MacroName == "NO")
MacroIndicatesWeShouldSkipTheCheck = true;
}
if (!MacroIndicatesWeShouldSkipTheCheck) {
llvm::APSInt Result;
if (CheckIfNull->IgnoreParenCasts()->EvaluateAsInt(
Result, ACtx, Expr::SE_AllowSideEffects)) {
if (Result == 0) {
if (!C->Pedantic)
return;
IsPedanticMatch = true;
}
}
}
}
const Stmt *Conv = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Stmt>("conv");
assert(Conv);
const Expr *ConvertedCObject = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Expr>("c_object");
const Expr *ConvertedCppObject = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Expr>("cpp_object");
const Expr *ConvertedObjCObject = Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Expr>("objc_object");
bool IsCpp = (ConvertedCppObject != nullptr);
bool IsObjC = (ConvertedObjCObject != nullptr);
const Expr *Obj = IsObjC ? ConvertedObjCObject
: IsCpp ? ConvertedCppObject
: ConvertedCObject;
assert(Obj);
bool IsComparison =
(Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Stmt>("comparison") != nullptr);
bool IsOSNumber =
(Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<Decl>("osnumber") != nullptr);
bool IsInteger =
(Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<QualType>("int_type") != nullptr);
bool IsObjCBool =
(Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<QualType>("objc_bool_type") != nullptr);
bool IsCppBool =
(Result.Nodes.getNodeAs<QualType>("cpp_bool_type") != nullptr);
llvm::SmallString<64> Msg;
llvm::raw_svector_ostream OS(Msg);
// Remove ObjC ARC qualifiers.
QualType ObjT = Obj->getType().getUnqualifiedType();
// Remove consts from pointers.
if (IsCpp) {
assert(ObjT.getCanonicalType()->isPointerType());
ObjT = ACtx.getPointerType(
ObjT->getPointeeType().getCanonicalType().getUnqualifiedType());
}
if (IsComparison)
OS << "Comparing ";
else
OS << "Converting ";
OS << "a pointer value of type '" << ObjT.getAsString() << "' to a ";
std::string EuphemismForPlain = "primitive";
std::string SuggestedApi = IsObjC ? (IsInteger ? "" : "-boolValue")
: IsCpp ? (IsOSNumber ? "" : "getValue()")
: "CFNumberGetValue()";
if (SuggestedApi.empty()) {
// A generic message if we're not sure what API should be called.
// FIXME: Pattern-match the integer type to make a better guess?
SuggestedApi =
"a method on '" + ObjT.getAsString() + "' to get the scalar value";
// "scalar" is not quite correct or common, but some documentation uses it
// when describing object methods we suggest. For consistency, we use
// "scalar" in the whole sentence when we need to use this word in at least
// one place, otherwise we use "primitive".
EuphemismForPlain = "scalar";
}
if (IsInteger)
OS << EuphemismForPlain << " integer value";
else if (IsObjCBool)
OS << EuphemismForPlain << " BOOL value";
else if (IsCppBool)
OS << EuphemismForPlain << " bool value";
else // Branch condition?
OS << EuphemismForPlain << " boolean value";
if (IsPedanticMatch)
OS << "; instead, either compare the pointer to "
<< (IsObjC ? "nil" : IsCpp ? "nullptr" : "NULL") << " or ";
else
OS << "; did you mean to ";
if (IsComparison)
OS << "compare the result of calling " << SuggestedApi;
else
OS << "call " << SuggestedApi;
if (!IsPedanticMatch)
OS << "?";
BR.EmitBasicReport(
ADC->getDecl(), C, "Suspicious number object conversion", "Logic error",
OS.str(),
PathDiagnosticLocation::createBegin(Obj, BR.getSourceManager(), ADC),
Conv->getSourceRange());
}
void NumberObjectConversionChecker::checkASTCodeBody(const Decl *D,
AnalysisManager &AM,
BugReporter &BR) const {
// Currently this matches CoreFoundation opaque pointer typedefs.
auto CSuspiciousNumberObjectExprM =
expr(ignoringParenImpCasts(
expr(hasType(
typedefType(hasDeclaration(anyOf(
typedefDecl(hasName("CFNumberRef")),
typedefDecl(hasName("CFBooleanRef")))))))
.bind("c_object")));
// Currently this matches XNU kernel number-object pointers.
auto CppSuspiciousNumberObjectExprM =
expr(ignoringParenImpCasts(
expr(hasType(hasCanonicalType(
pointerType(pointee(hasCanonicalType(
recordType(hasDeclaration(
anyOf(
cxxRecordDecl(hasName("OSBoolean")),
cxxRecordDecl(hasName("OSNumber"))
.bind("osnumber"))))))))))
.bind("cpp_object")));
// Currently this matches NeXTSTEP number objects.
auto ObjCSuspiciousNumberObjectExprM =
expr(ignoringParenImpCasts(
expr(hasType(hasCanonicalType(
objcObjectPointerType(pointee(
qualType(hasCanonicalType(
qualType(hasDeclaration(
objcInterfaceDecl(hasName("NSNumber")))))))))))
.bind("objc_object")));
auto SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM = anyOf(
CSuspiciousNumberObjectExprM,
CppSuspiciousNumberObjectExprM,
ObjCSuspiciousNumberObjectExprM);
// Useful for predicates like "Unless we've seen the same object elsewhere".
auto AnotherSuspiciousNumberObjectExprM =
expr(anyOf(
equalsBoundNode("c_object"),
equalsBoundNode("objc_object"),
equalsBoundNode("cpp_object")));
// The .bind here is in order to compose the error message more accurately.
auto ObjCSuspiciousScalarBooleanTypeM =
qualType(typedefType(hasDeclaration(
typedefDecl(hasName("BOOL"))))).bind("objc_bool_type");
// The .bind here is in order to compose the error message more accurately.
auto SuspiciousScalarBooleanTypeM =
qualType(anyOf(qualType(booleanType()).bind("cpp_bool_type"),
ObjCSuspiciousScalarBooleanTypeM));
// The .bind here is in order to compose the error message more accurately.
// Also avoid intptr_t and uintptr_t because they were specifically created
// for storing pointers.
auto SuspiciousScalarNumberTypeM =
qualType(hasCanonicalType(isInteger()),
unless(typedefType(hasDeclaration(
typedefDecl(matchesName("^::u?intptr_t$"))))))
.bind("int_type");
auto SuspiciousScalarTypeM =
qualType(anyOf(SuspiciousScalarBooleanTypeM,
SuspiciousScalarNumberTypeM));
auto SuspiciousScalarExprM =
expr(ignoringParenImpCasts(expr(hasType(SuspiciousScalarTypeM))));
auto ConversionThroughAssignmentM =
binaryOperator(allOf(hasOperatorName("="),
hasLHS(SuspiciousScalarExprM),
hasRHS(SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM)));
auto ConversionThroughBranchingM =
ifStmt(allOf(
hasCondition(SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM),
unless(hasConditionVariableStatement(declStmt())
))).bind("pedantic");
auto ConversionThroughCallM =
callExpr(hasAnyArgument(allOf(hasType(SuspiciousScalarTypeM),
ignoringParenImpCasts(
SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM))));
// We bind "check_if_null" to modify the warning message
// in case it was intended to compare a pointer to 0 with a relatively-ok
// construct "x == 0" or "x != 0".
auto ConversionThroughEquivalenceM =
binaryOperator(allOf(anyOf(hasOperatorName("=="), hasOperatorName("!=")),
hasEitherOperand(SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM),
hasEitherOperand(SuspiciousScalarExprM
.bind("check_if_null"))))
.bind("comparison");
auto ConversionThroughComparisonM =
binaryOperator(allOf(anyOf(hasOperatorName(">="), hasOperatorName(">"),
hasOperatorName("<="), hasOperatorName("<")),
hasEitherOperand(SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM),
hasEitherOperand(SuspiciousScalarExprM)))
.bind("comparison");
auto ConversionThroughConditionalOperatorM =
conditionalOperator(allOf(
hasCondition(SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM),
unless(hasTrueExpression(
hasDescendant(AnotherSuspiciousNumberObjectExprM))),
unless(hasFalseExpression(
hasDescendant(AnotherSuspiciousNumberObjectExprM)))))
.bind("pedantic");
auto ConversionThroughExclamationMarkM =
unaryOperator(allOf(hasOperatorName("!"),
has(expr(SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM))))
.bind("pedantic");
auto ConversionThroughExplicitBooleanCastM =
explicitCastExpr(allOf(hasType(SuspiciousScalarBooleanTypeM),
has(expr(SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM))));
auto ConversionThroughExplicitNumberCastM =
explicitCastExpr(allOf(hasType(SuspiciousScalarNumberTypeM),
has(expr(SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM))));
auto ConversionThroughInitializerM =
declStmt(hasSingleDecl(
varDecl(hasType(SuspiciousScalarTypeM),
hasInitializer(SuspiciousNumberObjectExprM))));
auto FinalM = stmt(anyOf(ConversionThroughAssignmentM,
ConversionThroughBranchingM,
ConversionThroughCallM,
ConversionThroughComparisonM,
ConversionThroughConditionalOperatorM,
ConversionThroughEquivalenceM,
ConversionThroughExclamationMarkM,
ConversionThroughExplicitBooleanCastM,
ConversionThroughExplicitNumberCastM,
ConversionThroughInitializerM)).bind("conv");
MatchFinder F;
Callback CB(this, BR, AM.getAnalysisDeclContext(D));
F.addMatcher(stmt(forEachDescendant(FinalM)), &CB);
F.match(*D->getBody(), AM.getASTContext());
}
void ento::registerNumberObjectConversionChecker(CheckerManager &Mgr) {
NumberObjectConversionChecker *Chk =
Mgr.registerChecker<NumberObjectConversionChecker>();
Chk->Pedantic =
Mgr.getAnalyzerOptions().getCheckerBooleanOption("Pedantic", false, Chk);
}