Files
clang-p2996/lldb/test/API/lang/cpp/namespace/TestNamespace.py
Muhammad Omair Javaid 6ea1a0d4fc [LLDB] Add/Remove xfail for some API tests on Windows
This patch add or removes XFAIL decorator from various tests which were marked
xfail for windows.

since 44363f2 various tests have started passing but introduced a couple of new failures.
Weight is in favor of new XPasses and I have removed XFail decorator from them. Also
some new tests have started failing for which we need to file separate bugs. I have
marked them xfail for now and will add the bug id after investigating the issue.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149235
2023-05-03 04:45:55 +05:00

237 lines
9.5 KiB
Python

"""
Test the printing of anonymous and named namespace variables.
"""
import lldb
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
class NamespaceBreakpointTestCase(TestBase):
@expectedFailureAll(bugnumber="llvm.org/pr28548", compiler="gcc")
@expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"])
def test_breakpoints_func_auto(self):
"""Test that we can set breakpoints correctly by basename to find all functions whose basename is "func"."""
self.build()
names = [
"func()",
"func(int)",
"A::B::func()",
"A::func()",
"A::func(int)"]
# Create a target by the debugger.
exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(exe)
self.assertTrue(target, VALID_TARGET)
module_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()
module_list.Append(lldb.SBFileSpec(exe, False))
cu_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()
# Set a breakpoint by name "func" which should pick up all functions
# whose basename is "func"
bp = target.BreakpointCreateByName(
"func", lldb.eFunctionNameTypeAuto, module_list, cu_list)
for bp_loc in bp:
name = bp_loc.GetAddress().GetFunction().GetName()
self.assertTrue(
name in names,
"make sure breakpoint locations are correct for 'func' with eFunctionNameTypeAuto")
@expectedFailureAll(bugnumber="llvm.org/pr28548", compiler="gcc")
@expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"])
def test_breakpoints_func_full(self):
"""Test that we can set breakpoints correctly by fullname to find all functions whose fully qualified name is "func"
(no namespaces)."""
self.build()
names = ["func()", "func(int)"]
# Create a target by the debugger.
exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(exe)
self.assertTrue(target, VALID_TARGET)
module_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()
module_list.Append(lldb.SBFileSpec(exe, False))
cu_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()
# Set a breakpoint by name "func" whose fullly qualified named matches "func" which
# should pick up only functions whose basename is "func" and has no
# containing context
bp = target.BreakpointCreateByName(
"func", lldb.eFunctionNameTypeFull, module_list, cu_list)
for bp_loc in bp:
name = bp_loc.GetAddress().GetFunction().GetName()
self.assertTrue(
name in names,
"make sure breakpoint locations are correct for 'func' with eFunctionNameTypeFull")
def test_breakpoints_a_func_full(self):
"""Test that we can set breakpoints correctly by fullname to find all functions whose fully qualified name is "A::func"."""
self.build()
names = ["A::func()", "A::func(int)"]
# Create a target by the debugger.
exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(exe)
self.assertTrue(target, VALID_TARGET)
module_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()
module_list.Append(lldb.SBFileSpec(exe, False))
cu_list = lldb.SBFileSpecList()
# Set a breakpoint by name "A::func" whose fullly qualified named matches "A::func" which
# should pick up only functions whose basename is "func" and is
# contained in the "A" namespace
bp = target.BreakpointCreateByName(
"A::func", lldb.eFunctionNameTypeFull, module_list, cu_list)
for bp_loc in bp:
name = bp_loc.GetAddress().GetFunction().GetName()
self.assertTrue(
name in names,
"make sure breakpoint locations are correct for 'A::func' with eFunctionNameTypeFull")
class NamespaceTestCase(TestBase):
def setUp(self):
# Call super's setUp().
TestBase.setUp(self)
# Find the line numbers for declarations of namespace variables i and
# j.
self.line_var_i = line_number(
'main.cpp', '// Find the line number for anonymous namespace variable i.')
self.line_var_j = line_number(
'main.cpp', '// Find the line number for named namespace variable j.')
# And the line number to break at.
self.line_break = line_number('main.cpp',
'// Set break point at this line.')
# Break inside do {} while and evaluate value
self.line_break_ns1 = line_number('main.cpp', '// Evaluate ns1::value')
self.line_break_ns2 = line_number('main.cpp', '// Evaluate ns2::value')
def runToBkpt(self, command):
self.runCmd(command, RUN_SUCCEEDED)
# The stop reason of the thread should be breakpoint.
self.expect("thread list", STOPPED_DUE_TO_BREAKPOINT,
substrs=['stopped',
'stop reason = breakpoint'])
# rdar://problem/8668674
@expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"], bugnumber="llvm.org/pr24764")
def test_with_run_command(self):
"""Test that anonymous and named namespace variables display correctly."""
self.build()
self.runCmd("file " + self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"), CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self,
"main.cpp",
self.line_break_ns1,
num_expected_locations=1,
loc_exact=True)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self,
"main.cpp",
self.line_break_ns2,
num_expected_locations=1,
loc_exact=True)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self,
"main.cpp",
self.line_break,
num_expected_locations=1,
loc_exact=True)
self.runToBkpt("run")
# Evaluate ns1::value
self.expect_expr("value", result_value="100")
self.runToBkpt("continue")
# Evaluate ns2::value
self.expect_expr("value", result_value="200")
self.runToBkpt("continue")
# On Mac OS X, gcc 4.2 emits the wrong debug info with respect to
# types.
slist = ['(int) a = 12', 'anon_uint', 'a_uint', 'b_uint', 'y_uint']
if self.platformIsDarwin() and self.getCompiler() in [
'clang', 'llvm-gcc']:
slist = ['(int) a = 12',
'::my_uint_t', 'anon_uint = 0',
'(A::uint_t) a_uint = 1',
'(A::B::uint_t) b_uint = 2',
'(Y::uint_t) y_uint = 3']
# 'frame variable' displays the local variables with type information.
self.expect('frame variable', VARIABLES_DISPLAYED_CORRECTLY,
substrs=slist)
# 'frame variable' with basename 'i' should work.
self.expect(
"frame variable --show-declaration --show-globals i",
startstr="main.cpp:%d: (int) (anonymous namespace)::i = 3" %
self.line_var_i)
# main.cpp:12: (int) (anonymous namespace)::i = 3
# 'frame variable' with basename 'j' should work, too.
self.expect(
"frame variable --show-declaration --show-globals j",
startstr="main.cpp:%d: (int) A::B::j = 4" %
self.line_var_j)
# main.cpp:19: (int) A::B::j = 4
# 'frame variable' should support address-of operator.
self.runCmd("frame variable &i")
# 'frame variable' with fully qualified name 'A::B::j' should work.
self.expect("frame variable A::B::j", VARIABLES_DISPLAYED_CORRECTLY,
startstr='(int) A::B::j = 4',
patterns=[' = 4'])
# So should the anonymous namespace case.
self.expect(
"frame variable '(anonymous namespace)::i'",
VARIABLES_DISPLAYED_CORRECTLY,
startstr='(int) (anonymous namespace)::i = 3',
patterns=[' = 3'])
# rdar://problem/8660275
# test/namespace: 'expression -- i+j' not working
# This has been fixed.
self.expect_expr("i + j", result_type="int", result_value="7")
# (int) $2 = 7
self.expect_expr("i", result_value="3")
self.expect_expr("j", result_value="4")
# rdar://problem/8668674
# expression command with fully qualified namespace for a variable does
# not work
self.expect_expr("::i", result_value="3")
self.expect_expr("A::B::j", result_value="4")
# expression command with function in anonymous namespace
self.expect_expr("myanonfunc(3)", result_value="6")
# global namespace qualification with function in anonymous namespace
self.expect_expr("myanonfunc(4)", result_value="8")
self.expect("expression myanonfunc",
patterns=['\(anonymous namespace\)::myanonfunc\(int\)'])
self.expect("expression variadic_sum", patterns=[
'\(anonymous namespace\)::variadic_sum\(int, ...\)'])
self.expect_expr("::B::Bar b; b.x()", result_type="int", result_value="42")
self.expect_expr("A::B::Bar b; b.y()", result_type="int", result_value="137")
self.expect_expr("::NS1::NS2::Foo{}.bar() == -2 && ::NS2::Foo{}.bar() == -3",
result_type="bool", result_value="true")
# FIXME: C++ unqualified namespace lookups currently not supported when instantiating types.
self.expect_expr("NS2::Foo{}.bar() == -3", result_type="bool", result_value="false")
self.expect_expr("((::B::Bar*)&::B::bar)->x()", result_type="int", result_value="42")