Files
clang-p2996/clang/test/Parser/cxx0x-ambig.cpp
Serge Pavlov 2e3ecb660a Recover from errors in enum definition
Previously any error in enum definition body stopped parsing it. With this
change parser tries to recover from errors.
The patch fixes PR10982.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2018

llvm-svn: 198259
2013-12-31 06:26:03 +00:00

152 lines
5.3 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
// New exciting ambiguities in C++11
// final 'context sensitive' mess.
namespace final {
struct S { int n; };
struct T { int n; };
namespace N {
int n;
// These declare variables named final..
extern struct S final;
extern struct S final [[]];
extern struct S final, foo;
struct S final = S();
// This defines a class, not a variable, even though it would successfully
// parse as a variable but not as a class. DR1318's wording suggests that
// this disambiguation is only performed on an ambiguity, but that was not
// the intent.
struct S final { // expected-note {{here}}
int(n) // expected-error {{expected ';'}}
};
// This too.
struct T final : S {}; // expected-error {{base 'S' is marked 'final'}}
struct T bar : S {}; // expected-error {{expected ';' after top level declarator}} expected-error {{expected unqualified-id}}
}
// _Alignas isn't allowed in the places where alignas is. We used to
// assert on this.
struct U final _Alignas(4) {}; // expected-error 3{{}} expected-note {{}}
}
// enum versus bitfield mess.
namespace bitfield {
enum E {};
struct T {
constexpr T() {}
constexpr T(int) {}
constexpr T(T, T, T, T) {}
constexpr T operator=(T) const { return *this; }
constexpr operator int() const { return 4; }
};
constexpr T a, b, c, d;
struct S1 {
enum E : T ( a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, 4 ); // ok, declares a bitfield
};
// This could be a bit-field.
struct S2 {
enum E : T { a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, 4 }; // expected-error {{non-integral type}} expected-error {{expected identifier}}
};
struct S3 {
enum E : int { a = 1, b = 2, c = 3, d }; // ok, defines an enum
};
// Ambiguous.
struct S4 {
enum E : int { a = 1 }; // ok, defines an enum
};
// This could be a bit-field, but would be ill-formed due to the anonymous
// member being initialized.
struct S5 {
enum E : int { a = 1 } { b = 2 }; // expected-error {{expected ';' after enum}} expected-error {{expected member name}}
};
// This could be a bit-field.
struct S6 {
enum E : int { 1 }; // expected-error {{expected identifier}}
};
struct U {
constexpr operator T() const { return T(); } // expected-note 2{{candidate}}
};
// This could be a bit-field.
struct S7 {
enum E : int { a = U() }; // expected-error {{no viable conversion}}
};
// This could be a bit-field, and does not conform to the grammar of an
// enum definition, because 'id(U())' is not a constant-expression.
constexpr const U &id(const U &u) { return u; }
struct S8 {
enum E : int { a = id(U()) }; // expected-error {{no viable conversion}}
};
}
namespace trailing_return {
typedef int n;
int a;
struct S {
S(int);
S *operator()(...) const;
int n;
};
namespace N {
void f() {
// This parses as a function declaration, but DR1223 makes the presence of
// 'auto' be used for disambiguation.
S(a)()->n; // ok, expression; expected-warning{{expression result unused}}
S(a)(int())->n; // ok, expression; expected-warning{{expression result unused}}
auto(a)()->n; // ok, function declaration
auto(b)(int())->n; // ok, function declaration
using T = decltype(a);
using T = auto() -> n;
}
}
}
namespace ellipsis {
template<typename...T>
struct S {
void e(S::S());
void f(S(...args[sizeof(T)])); // expected-note {{here}}
void f(S(...args)[sizeof(T)]); // expected-error {{redeclared}} expected-note {{here}}
void f(S ...args[sizeof(T)]); // expected-error {{redeclared}}
void g(S(...[sizeof(T)])); // expected-note {{here}} expected-warning {{ISO C++11 requires a parenthesized pack declaration to have a name}}
void g(S(...)[sizeof(T)]); // expected-error {{function cannot return array type}}
void g(S ...[sizeof(T)]); // expected-error {{redeclared}}
void h(T(...)); // function type, expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}}
void h(T...); // pack expansion, ok
void i(int(T...)); // expected-note {{here}}
void i(int(T...a)); // expected-error {{redeclared}}
void i(int(T, ...)); // function type, expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}}
void i(int(T, ...a)); // expected-error {{expected ')'}} expected-note {{to match}} expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}}
void j(int(int...)); // function type, ok
void j(int(int...a)); // expected-error {{does not contain any unexpanded parameter packs}}
void j(T(int...)); // expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}}
void j(T(T...)); // expected-error {{unexpanded parameter pack}}
void k(int(...)(T)); // expected-error {{cannot return function type}}
void k(int ...(T));
void l(int(&...)(T)); // expected-warning {{ISO C++11 requires a parenthesized pack declaration to have a name}}
void l(int(*...)(T)); // expected-warning {{ISO C++11 requires a parenthesized pack declaration to have a name}}
void l(int(S<int>::*...)(T)); // expected-warning {{ISO C++11 requires a parenthesized pack declaration to have a name}}
};
}
namespace braced_init_list {
struct X {
void foo() {}
};
void (*pf1)() {};
void (X::*pmf1)() {&X::foo};
void (X::*pmf2)() = {&X::foo};
void test() {
void (*pf2)() {};
void (X::*pmf3)() {&X::foo};
void (X::*pmf4)() = {&X::foo};
}
}