Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/Transforms/IRCE/eq_ne.ll
Max Kazantsev 9ac7021a25 [IRCE] Fix intersection between signed and unsigned ranges
IRCE for unsigned latch conditions was temporarily disabled by rL314881. The motivating
example contained an unsigned latch condition and a signed range check. One of the safe
iteration ranges was `[1, SINT_MAX + 1]`. Its right border was incorrectly interpreted as a negative
value in `IntersectRange` function, this lead to a miscompile under which we deleted a range check
without inserting a postloop where it was needed.

This patch brings back IRCE for unsigned latch conditions. Now we treat range intersection more
carefully. If the latch condition was unsigned, we only try to consider a range check for deletion if:
1. The range check is also unsigned, or
2. Safe iteration range of the range check lies within `[0, SINT_MAX]`.
The same is done for signed latch.

Values from `[0, SINT_MAX]` are unambiguous, these values are non-negative under any interpretation,
and all values of a range intersected with such range are also non-negative.

We also use signed/unsigned min/max functions for range intersection depending on type of the
latch condition.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38581

llvm-svn: 316552
2017-10-25 06:47:39 +00:00

292 lines
7.9 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt -verify-loop-info -irce-print-changed-loops -irce -S < %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; CHECK: irce: in function test_01: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
; CHECK: irce: in function test_01u: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
; CHECK-NOT: irce: in function test_02: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
; CHECK: irce: in function test_03: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
; CHECK-NOT: irce: in function test_04: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
; CHECK: irce: in function test_05: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
; CHECK-NOT: irce: in function test_06: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
; CHECK: irce: in function test_07: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
; CHECK-NOT: irce: in function test_08: constrained Loop at depth 1 containing: %loop<header><exiting>,%in.bounds<latch><exiting>
; Show that IRCE can turn 'ne' condition to 'slt' in increasing IV when the IV
; can be negative at some point.
define void @test_01(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
; CHECK: test_01
; CHECK: main.exit.selector:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PSEUDO_PHI:%[^ ]+]] = phi i32 [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%[^ ]+]] = icmp slt i32 [[PSEUDO_PHI]], 100
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND]]
entry:
%len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%idx = phi i32 [ -3, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
%idx.next = add i32 %idx, 1
%abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
in.bounds:
%addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
store i32 0, i32* %addr
%next = icmp ne i32 %idx.next, 100
br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
out.of.bounds:
ret void
exit:
ret void
}
; Show that IRCE can turn 'ne' condition to 'ult' in increasing IV when IV is
; non-negative.
define void @test_01u(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
; CHECK: test_01u
; CHECK: main.exit.selector:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PSEUDO_PHI:%[^ ]+]] = phi i32 [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%[^ ]+]] = icmp ult i32 [[PSEUDO_PHI]], 100
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND]]
entry:
%len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
%idx.next = add i32 %idx, 1
%abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
in.bounds:
%addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
store i32 0, i32* %addr
%next = icmp ne i32 %idx.next, 100
br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
out.of.bounds:
ret void
exit:
ret void
}
; Show that if n is not known to be greater than the starting value, IRCE
; doesn't apply.
define void @test_02(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
; CHECK: test_02(
entry:
%len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
%idx.next = add i32 %idx, 1
%abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
in.bounds:
%addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
store i32 0, i32* %addr
%next = icmp ne i32 %idx.next, -100
br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
out.of.bounds:
ret void
exit:
ret void
}
; Show that IRCE can turn 'eq' condition to 'sge' in increasing IV.
define void @test_03(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
; CHECK: test_03(
; CHECK: main.exit.selector:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PSEUDO_PHI:%[^ ]+]] = phi i32 [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%[^ ]+]] = icmp slt i32 [[PSEUDO_PHI]], 100
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND]]
entry:
%len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
%idx.next = add i32 %idx, 1
%abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
in.bounds:
%addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
store i32 0, i32* %addr
%next = icmp eq i32 %idx.next, 100
br i1 %next, label %exit, label %loop
out.of.bounds:
ret void
exit:
ret void
}
; Show that if n is not known to be greater than the starting value, IRCE
; doesn't apply.
define void @test_04(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
; CHECK: test_04(
entry:
%len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%idx = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
%idx.next = add i32 %idx, 1
%abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
in.bounds:
%addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
store i32 0, i32* %addr
%next = icmp eq i32 %idx.next, -100
br i1 %next, label %exit, label %loop
out.of.bounds:
ret void
exit:
ret void
}
; Show that IRCE can turn 'ne' condition to 'sgt' in decreasing IV.
define void @test_05(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
; CHECK: test_05(
; CHECK: preloop.exit.selector:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PSEUDO_PHI:%[^ ]+]] = phi i32 [ %idx.next.preloop, %in.bounds.preloop ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%[^ ]+]] = icmp sgt i32 [[PSEUDO_PHI]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND]]
entry:
%len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%idx = phi i32 [ 100, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
%idx.next = add i32 %idx, -1
%abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
in.bounds:
%addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
store i32 0, i32* %addr
%next = icmp ne i32 %idx.next, 0
br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
out.of.bounds:
ret void
exit:
ret void
}
; Show that IRCE cannot turn 'ne' condition to 'sgt' in decreasing IV if the end
; value is not proved to be less than the start value.
define void @test_06(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
; CHECK: test_06(
entry:
%len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%idx = phi i32 [ 100, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
%idx.next = add i32 %idx, -1
%abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
in.bounds:
%addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
store i32 0, i32* %addr
%next = icmp ne i32 %idx.next, 120
br i1 %next, label %loop, label %exit
out.of.bounds:
ret void
exit:
ret void
}
; Show that IRCE can turn 'eq' condition to 'slt' in decreasing IV.
define void @test_07(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
; CHECK: test_07(
; CHECK: preloop.exit.selector:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PSEUDO_PHI:%[^ ]+]] = phi i32 [ %idx.next.preloop, %in.bounds.preloop ]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[COND:%[^ ]+]] = icmp sgt i32 [[PSEUDO_PHI]], 0
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[COND]]
entry:
%len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%idx = phi i32 [ 100, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
%idx.next = add i32 %idx, -1
%abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
in.bounds:
%addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
store i32 0, i32* %addr
%next = icmp eq i32 %idx.next, 0
br i1 %next, label %exit, label %loop
out.of.bounds:
ret void
exit:
ret void
}
; Show that IRCE cannot turn 'eq' condition to 'slt' in decreasing IV if the end
; value is not proved to be less than the start value.
define void @test_08(i32* %arr, i32* %a_len_ptr) #0 {
; CHECK: test_08(
entry:
%len = load i32, i32* %a_len_ptr, !range !0
br label %loop
loop:
%idx = phi i32 [ 100, %entry ], [ %idx.next, %in.bounds ]
%idx.next = add i32 %idx, -1
%abc = icmp slt i32 %idx, %len
br i1 %abc, label %in.bounds, label %out.of.bounds
in.bounds:
%addr = getelementptr i32, i32* %arr, i32 %idx
store i32 0, i32* %addr
%next = icmp eq i32 %idx.next, 120
br i1 %next, label %exit, label %loop
out.of.bounds:
ret void
exit:
ret void
}
!0 = !{i32 0, i32 50}