Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopInterchange/not-interchanged-tightly-nested.ll
Florian Hahn 4284049dcc [LoopInterchange] Do not interchange loops with function calls.
Summary:
Without any information about the called function, we cannot be sure
that it is safe to interchange loops which contain function calls. For
example there could be dependences that prevent interchanging between
accesses in the called function and the loops. Even functions without any
parameters could cause problems, as they could access memory using
global pointers.

For now, I think it is only safe to interchange loops with calls marked
as readnone.

With this patch, the LLVM test suite passes with `-O3 -mllvm
-enable-loopinterchange` and LoopInterchangeProfitability::isProfitable
returning true for all loops. check-llvm and check-clang also pass when
bootstrapped in a similar fashion, although only 3 loops got
interchanged.

Reviewers: karthikthecool, blitz.opensource, hfinkel, mcrosier, mkuper

Reviewed By: mcrosier

Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35489

llvm-svn: 309547
2017-07-31 09:00:52 +00:00

144 lines
5.0 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -S | FileCheck %s
;; We test the complete .ll for adjustment in outer loop header/latch and inner loop header/latch.
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
@A = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
@B = common global [100 x i32] zeroinitializer
@C = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
@D = common global [100 x [100 x [100 x i32]]] zeroinitializer
;; Loops not tightly nested are not interchanged
;; for(int j=0;j<N;j++) {
;; B[j] = j+k;
;; for(int i=0;i<N;i++)
;; A[j][i] = A[j][i]+B[j];
;; }
define void @interchange_05(i32 %k, i32 %N){
entry:
%cmp30 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 0
br i1 %cmp30, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end17
for.body.lr.ph:
%0 = add i32 %N, -1
%1 = zext i32 %k to i64
br label %for.body
for.body:
%indvars.iv32 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next33, %for.inc15 ]
%2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv32, %1
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [100 x i32], [100 x i32]* @B, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv32
%3 = trunc i64 %2 to i32
store i32 %3, i32* %arrayidx
br label %for.body3
for.body3:
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ]
%arrayidx7 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv32, i64 %indvars.iv
%4 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx7
%add10 = add nsw i32 %3, %4
store i32 %add10, i32* %arrayidx7
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc15, label %for.body3
for.inc15:
%indvars.iv.next33 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv32, 1
%lftr.wideiv35 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv32 to i32
%exitcond36 = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv35, %0
br i1 %exitcond36, label %for.end17, label %for.body
for.end17:
ret void
}
; CHECK-LABEL: @interchange_05
; CHECK: entry:
; CHECK: %cmp30 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 0
; CHECK: br i1 %cmp30, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end17
; CHECK: for.body.lr.ph:
; CHECK: %0 = add i32 %N, -1
; CHECK: %1 = zext i32 %k to i64
; CHECK: br label %for.body
; CHECK: for.body:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv32 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next33, %for.inc15 ]
; CHECK: %2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv32, %1
; CHECK: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [100 x i32], [100 x i32]* @B, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv32
; CHECK: %3 = trunc i64 %2 to i32
; CHECK: store i32 %3, i32* %arrayidx
; CHECK: br label %for.body3.preheader
; CHECK: for.body3.preheader:
; CHECK: br label %for.body3
; CHECK: for.body3:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ], [ 0, %for.body3.preheader ]
; CHECK: %arrayidx7 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv32, i64 %indvars.iv
; CHECK: %4 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx7
; CHECK: %add10 = add nsw i32 %3, %4
; CHECK: store i32 %add10, i32* %arrayidx7
; CHECK: %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
; CHECK: %lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
; CHECK: %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
; CHECK: br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc15, label %for.body3
; CHECK: for.inc15:
; CHECK: %indvars.iv.next33 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv32, 1
; CHECK: %lftr.wideiv35 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv32 to i32
; CHECK: %exitcond36 = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv35, %0
; CHECK: br i1 %exitcond36, label %for.end17.loopexit, label %for.body
; CHECK: for.end17.loopexit:
; CHECK: br label %for.end17
; CHECK: for.end17:
; CHECK: ret void
declare void @foo(...) readnone
;; Loops not tightly nested are not interchanged
;; for(int j=0;j<N;j++) {
;; foo();
;; for(int i=2;i<N;i++)
;; A[j][i] = A[j][i]+k;
;; }
define void @interchange_06(i32 %k, i32 %N) {
entry:
%cmp22 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 0
br i1 %cmp22, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end12
for.body.lr.ph:
%0 = add i32 %N, -1
br label %for.body
for.body:
%indvars.iv24 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next25, %for.inc10 ]
tail call void (...) @foo()
br label %for.body3
for.body3:
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ], [ 2, %for.body ]
%arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv24, i64 %indvars.iv
%1 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5
%add = add nsw i32 %1, %k
store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx5
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc10, label %for.body3
for.inc10:
%indvars.iv.next25 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv24, 1
%lftr.wideiv26 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv24 to i32
%exitcond27 = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv26, %0
br i1 %exitcond27, label %for.end12, label %for.body
for.end12:
ret void
}
;; Here we are checking if the inner phi is not split then we have not interchanged.
; CHECK-LABEL: @interchange_06
; CHECK: phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ], [ 2, %for.body3.preheader ]
; CHECK-NEXT: getelementptr
; CHECK-NEXT: %1 = load