Files
clang-p2996/clang/test/OpenMP/assumes_template_print.cpp
Giuliano Belinassi 46f3ade508 Fix ast print of variables with attributes
Previously clang AST prints the following declaration:

int fun_var_unused() {

  int x __attribute__((unused)) = 0;
  return x;
}

and

int __declspec(thread) x = 0;

as:

int fun_var_unused() {

  int x = 0 __attribute__((unused));
  return x;
}

and

int x = __declspec(thread) 0;

which is rejected by C/C++ parser. This patch modifies the logic to
print old C attributes for variables as:

int __attribute__((unused)) x = 0;
and the __declspec case as:

int __declspec(thread) x = 0;
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/59973

Previous version: D141714.

Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D141714
2023-09-07 13:35:50 -07:00

92 lines
2.9 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fopenmp -ast-print %s | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fopenmp -x c++ -std=c++11 -emit-pch -o %t %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fopenmp -std=c++11 -include-pch %t -fsyntax-only -verify %s -ast-print | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify -fopenmp-simd -ast-print %s | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fopenmp-simd -x c++ -std=c++11 -emit-pch -o %t %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fopenmp-simd -std=c++11 -include-pch %t -fsyntax-only -verify %s -ast-print | FileCheck %s
// expected-no-diagnostics
// It is unclear if we want to annotate the template instantiations, e.g., S<int>::foo, or not in the two
// situations shown below. Since it is always fair to drop assumptions, we do that for now.
#ifndef HEADER
#define HEADER
template <typename T>
struct S {
int a;
// CHECK: template <typename T> struct S {
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void foo() {
void foo() {
#pragma omp parallel
{}
}
};
// CHECK: template<> struct S<int> {
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void foo() {
#pragma omp begin assumes no_openmp
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("omp_no_openmp"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void S_with_assumes_no_call() {
void S_with_assumes_no_call() {
S<int> s;
s.a = 0;
}
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("omp_no_openmp"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void S_with_assumes_call() {
void S_with_assumes_call() {
S<int> s;
s.a = 0;
// If this is executed we have UB!
s.foo();
}
#pragma omp end assumes
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void S_without_assumes() {
void S_without_assumes() {
S<int> s;
s.foo();
}
#pragma omp assumes ext_global_assumption
// Same as the struct S above but the order in which we instantiate P is different, first outside of an assumes.
template <typename T>
struct P {
// CHECK: template <typename T> struct P {
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void foo() {
int a;
void foo() {
#pragma omp parallel
{}
}
};
// TODO: Avoid the duplication here:
// CHECK: template<> struct P<int> {
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void foo() {
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void P_without_assumes() {
void P_without_assumes() {
P<int> p;
p.foo();
}
#pragma omp begin assumes no_openmp
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("omp_no_openmp"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void P_with_assumes_no_call() {
void P_with_assumes_no_call() {
P<int> p;
p.a = 0;
}
// CHECK: __attribute__((assume("omp_no_openmp"))) __attribute__((assume("ompx_global_assumption"))) void P_with_assumes_call() {
void P_with_assumes_call() {
P<int> p;
p.a = 0;
// If this is executed we have UB!
p.foo();
}
#pragma omp end assumes
#endif