Yet more problems due to the missing CXXBindTemporaryExpr in the CFG for default arguments. Unfortunately we cannot just switch off inserting temporaries for the corresponding default arguments, as that breaks existing tests (test/SemaCXX/return-noreturn.cpp:245). llvm-svn: 215554
476 lines
14 KiB
C++
476 lines
14 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -w -std=c++03 %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -w -std=c++11 %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection -DTEMPORARY_DTORS -verify -w -analyzer-config cfg-temporary-dtors=true %s -std=c++11
|
|
|
|
extern bool clang_analyzer_eval(bool);
|
|
extern bool clang_analyzer_warnIfReached();
|
|
|
|
struct Trivial {
|
|
Trivial(int x) : value(x) {}
|
|
int value;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct NonTrivial : public Trivial {
|
|
NonTrivial(int x) : Trivial(x) {}
|
|
~NonTrivial();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trivial getTrivial() {
|
|
return Trivial(42); // no-warning
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const Trivial &getTrivialRef() {
|
|
return Trivial(42); // expected-warning {{Address of stack memory associated with temporary object of type 'Trivial' returned to caller}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
NonTrivial getNonTrivial() {
|
|
return NonTrivial(42); // no-warning
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const NonTrivial &getNonTrivialRef() {
|
|
return NonTrivial(42); // expected-warning {{Address of stack memory associated with temporary object of type 'NonTrivial' returned to caller}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace rdar13265460 {
|
|
struct TrivialSubclass : public Trivial {
|
|
TrivialSubclass(int x) : Trivial(x), anotherValue(-x) {}
|
|
int anotherValue;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
TrivialSubclass getTrivialSub() {
|
|
TrivialSubclass obj(1);
|
|
obj.value = 42;
|
|
obj.anotherValue = -42;
|
|
return obj;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testImmediate() {
|
|
TrivialSubclass obj = getTrivialSub();
|
|
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(obj.value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(obj.anotherValue == -42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(getTrivialSub().value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(getTrivialSub().anotherValue == -42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testMaterializeTemporaryExpr() {
|
|
const TrivialSubclass &ref = getTrivialSub();
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(ref.value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
const Trivial &baseRef = getTrivialSub();
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(baseRef.value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace rdar13281951 {
|
|
struct Derived : public Trivial {
|
|
Derived(int value) : Trivial(value), value2(-value) {}
|
|
int value2;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void test() {
|
|
Derived obj(1);
|
|
obj.value = 42;
|
|
const Trivial * const &pointerRef = &obj;
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(pointerRef->value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace compound_literals {
|
|
struct POD {
|
|
int x, y;
|
|
};
|
|
struct HasCtor {
|
|
HasCtor(int x, int y) : x(x), y(y) {}
|
|
int x, y;
|
|
};
|
|
struct HasDtor {
|
|
int x, y;
|
|
~HasDtor();
|
|
};
|
|
struct HasCtorDtor {
|
|
HasCtorDtor(int x, int y) : x(x), y(y) {}
|
|
~HasCtorDtor();
|
|
int x, y;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void test() {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(((POD){1, 42}).y == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(((HasDtor){1, 42}).y == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(((HasCtor){1, 42}).y == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: should be TRUE, but we don't inline the constructors of
|
|
// temporaries because we can't model their destructors yet.
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(((HasCtorDtor){1, 42}).y == 42); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
|
|
#endif
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace destructors {
|
|
struct Dtor {
|
|
~Dtor();
|
|
};
|
|
extern bool coin();
|
|
extern bool check(const Dtor &);
|
|
|
|
void testPR16664andPR18159Crash() {
|
|
// Regression test: we used to assert here when tmp dtors are enabled.
|
|
// PR16664 and PR18159
|
|
if (coin() && (coin() || coin() || check(Dtor()))) {
|
|
Dtor();
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#ifdef TEMPORARY_DTORS
|
|
struct NoReturnDtor {
|
|
~NoReturnDtor() __attribute__((noreturn));
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void noReturnTemp(int *x) {
|
|
if (! x) NoReturnDtor();
|
|
*x = 47; // no warning
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void noReturnInline(int **x) {
|
|
NoReturnDtor();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void callNoReturn() {
|
|
int *x;
|
|
noReturnInline(&x);
|
|
*x = 47; // no warning
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
extern bool check(const NoReturnDtor &);
|
|
|
|
void testConsistencyIf(int i) {
|
|
if (i != 5)
|
|
return;
|
|
if (i == 5 && (i == 4 || check(NoReturnDtor()) || i == 5)) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testConsistencyTernary(int i) {
|
|
(i == 5 && (i == 4 || check(NoReturnDtor()) || i == 5)) ? 1 : 0;
|
|
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
if (i != 5)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
(i == 5 && (i == 4 || check(NoReturnDtor()) || i == 5)) ? 1 : 0;
|
|
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Regression test: we used to assert here.
|
|
// PR16664 and PR18159
|
|
void testConsistencyNested(int i) {
|
|
extern bool compute(bool);
|
|
|
|
if (i == 5 && (i == 4 || i == 5 || check(NoReturnDtor())))
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
if (i == 5 && (i == 4 || i == 5 || check(NoReturnDtor())))
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
if (i != 5)
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (compute(i == 5 &&
|
|
(i == 4 || compute(true) ||
|
|
compute(i == 5 && (i == 4 || check(NoReturnDtor()))))) ||
|
|
i != 4) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (compute(i == 5 &&
|
|
(i == 4 || i == 4 ||
|
|
compute(i == 5 && (i == 4 || check(NoReturnDtor()))))) ||
|
|
i != 4) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// PR16664 and PR18159
|
|
void testConsistencyNestedSimple(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
if (!value || check(NoReturnDtor())) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// PR16664 and PR18159
|
|
void testConsistencyNestedComplex(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
if (!value || !value || check(NoReturnDtor())) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// PR16664 and PR18159
|
|
void testConsistencyNestedWarning(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
if (!value || value || check(NoReturnDtor())) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
// PR16664 and PR18159
|
|
void testConsistencyNestedComplexMidBranch(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
if (!value || !value || check(NoReturnDtor()) || value) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// PR16664 and PR18159
|
|
void testConsistencyNestedComplexNestedBranch(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
if (!value || (!value || check(NoReturnDtor()) || value)) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// PR16664 and PR18159
|
|
void testConsistencyNestedVariableModification(bool value) {
|
|
bool other = true;
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
if (!other || !value || (other = false) || check(NoReturnDtor()) ||
|
|
!other) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testTernaryNoReturnTrueBranch(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
bool b = value && (value ? check(NoReturnDtor()) : true);
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
void testTernaryNoReturnFalseBranch(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
bool b = !value && !value ? true : check(NoReturnDtor());
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
void testTernaryIgnoreNoreturnBranch(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
bool b = !value && !value ? check(NoReturnDtor()) : true;
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
void testTernaryTrueBranchReached(bool value) {
|
|
value ? clang_analyzer_warnIfReached() : // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
check(NoReturnDtor());
|
|
}
|
|
void testTernaryFalseBranchReached(bool value) {
|
|
value ? check(NoReturnDtor()) :
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testLoop() {
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
|
|
if (i < 3 && (i >= 2 || check(NoReturnDtor()))) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool testRecursiveFrames(bool isInner) {
|
|
if (isInner ||
|
|
(clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(), false) || // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
check(NoReturnDtor()) ||
|
|
testRecursiveFrames(true)) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
void testRecursiveFramesStart() { testRecursiveFrames(false); }
|
|
|
|
void testLambdas() {
|
|
// This is the test we would like to write:
|
|
// []() { check(NoReturnDtor()); } != nullptr || check(Dtor());
|
|
// But currently the analyzer stops when it encounters a lambda:
|
|
[] {};
|
|
// The CFG for this now looks correct, but we still do not reach the line
|
|
// below.
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // FIXME: Should warn.
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testGnuExpressionStatements(int v) {
|
|
({ ++v; v == 10 || check(NoReturnDtor()); v == 42; }) || v == 23;
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
|
|
({ ++v; check(NoReturnDtor()); v == 42; }) || v == 23;
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testGnuExpressionStatementsDestructionPoint(int v) {
|
|
// In normal context, the temporary destructor runs at the end of the full
|
|
// statement, thus the last statement is reached.
|
|
(++v, check(NoReturnDtor()), v == 42),
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
|
|
// GNU expression statements execute temporary destructors within the
|
|
// blocks, thus the last statement is not reached.
|
|
({ ++v; check(NoReturnDtor()); v == 42; }),
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testMultipleTemporaries(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
// FIXME: Find a way to verify construction order.
|
|
// ~Dtor should run before ~NoReturnDtor() because construction order is
|
|
// guaranteed by comma operator.
|
|
if (!value || check((NoReturnDtor(), Dtor())) || value) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testBinaryOperatorShortcut(bool value) {
|
|
if (value) {
|
|
if (false && false && check(NoReturnDtor()) && true) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(true);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testIfAtEndOfLoop() {
|
|
int y = 0;
|
|
while (true) {
|
|
if (y > 0) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
}
|
|
++y;
|
|
// Test that the CFG gets hooked up correctly when temporary destructors
|
|
// are handled after a statically known branch condition.
|
|
if (true) (void)0; else (void)check(NoReturnDtor());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testTernaryAtEndOfLoop() {
|
|
int y = 0;
|
|
while (true) {
|
|
if (y > 0) {
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
}
|
|
++y;
|
|
// Test that the CFG gets hooked up correctly when temporary destructors
|
|
// are handled after a statically known branch condition.
|
|
true ? (void)0 : (void)check(NoReturnDtor());
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testNoReturnInComplexCondition() {
|
|
check(Dtor()) &&
|
|
(check(NoReturnDtor()) || check(NoReturnDtor())) && check(Dtor());
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testSequencingOfConditionalTempDtors(bool b) {
|
|
b || (check(Dtor()), check(NoReturnDtor()));
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testSequencingOfConditionalTempDtors2(bool b) {
|
|
(b || check(Dtor())), check(NoReturnDtor());
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no warning, unreachable code
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testSequencingOfConditionalTempDtorsWithinBinaryOperators(bool b) {
|
|
b || (check(Dtor()) + check(NoReturnDtor()));
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void f(Dtor d = Dtor());
|
|
void testDefaultParameters() {
|
|
f();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct DefaultParam {
|
|
DefaultParam(int, const Dtor& d = Dtor());
|
|
~DefaultParam();
|
|
};
|
|
void testDefaultParamConstructorsInLoops() {
|
|
while (true) {
|
|
// FIXME: This exact pattern triggers the temporary cleanup logic
|
|
// to fail when adding a 'clean' state.
|
|
DefaultParam(42);
|
|
DefaultParam(42);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
void testDefaultParamConstructorsInTernariesInLoops(bool value) {
|
|
while (true) {
|
|
// FIXME: This exact pattern triggers the temporary cleanup logic
|
|
// to visit the bind-temporary logic with a state that already has that
|
|
// temporary marked as executed.
|
|
value ? DefaultParam(42) : DefaultParam(42);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
#endif // TEMPORARY_DTORS
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testStaticMaterializeTemporaryExpr() {
|
|
static const Trivial &ref = getTrivial();
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(ref.value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
static const Trivial &directRef = Trivial(42);
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(directRef.value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
#if __has_feature(cxx_thread_local)
|
|
thread_local static const Trivial &threadRef = getTrivial();
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(threadRef.value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
thread_local static const Trivial &threadDirectRef = Trivial(42);
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(threadDirectRef.value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
#endif
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace PR16629 {
|
|
struct A {
|
|
explicit A(int* p_) : p(p_) {}
|
|
int* p;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
extern void escape(const A*[]);
|
|
extern void check(int);
|
|
|
|
void callEscape(const A& a) {
|
|
const A* args[] = { &a };
|
|
escape(args);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testNoWarning() {
|
|
int x;
|
|
callEscape(A(&x));
|
|
check(x); // Analyzer used to give a "x is uninitialized warning" here
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void set(const A*a[]) {
|
|
*a[0]->p = 47;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void callSet(const A& a) {
|
|
const A* args[] = { &a };
|
|
set(args);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void testConsistency() {
|
|
int x;
|
|
callSet(A(&x));
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(x == 47); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|