Logo
Explore Help
Register Sign In
caio/clang-p2996
1
0
Fork 0
You've already forked clang-p2996
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
2c1905386c0c4e73dc4e729a76f1095acdff2d2f
clang-p2996/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/X86
History
Sanjay Patel d7c702b451 [LoopStrengthReduce, x86] don't add cost for a cmp that will be macro-fused (PR35681)
In the motivating case from PR35681 and represented by the macro-fuse-cmp test:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35681
...there's a 37 -> 31 byte size win for the loop because we eliminate the big base 
address offsets.

SPEC2017 on Ryzen shows no significant perf difference.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42607

llvm-svn: 324289
2018-02-05 23:43:05 +00:00
..
2008-08-14-ShadowIV.ll
…
2009-11-10-LSRCrash.ll
…
2011-07-20-DoubleIV.ll
…
2011-11-29-postincphi.ll
…
2011-12-04-loserreg.ll
…
2012-01-13-phielim.ll
…
bin_power.ll
…
canonical-2.ll
…
canonical.ll
…
incorrect-offset-scaling.ll
…
ivchain-stress-X86.ll
…
ivchain-X86.ll
[LoopStrengthReduce, x86] don't add cost for a cmp that will be macro-fused (PR35681)
2018-02-05 23:43:05 +00:00
lit.local.cfg
…
lsr-expand-quadratic.ll
…
lsr-filtering-scaledreg.ll
…
lsr-insns-1.ll
…
lsr-insns-2.ll
…
macro-fuse-cmp.ll
[LoopStrengthReduce, x86] don't add cost for a cmp that will be macro-fused (PR35681)
2018-02-05 23:43:05 +00:00
nested-loop.ll
[LSR] Don't force bases of foldable formulae to the final type.
2018-02-01 06:38:34 +00:00
no_superflous_induction_vars.ll
…
pr17473.ll
…
pr28719.ll
…
sibling-loops.ll
…
Powered by Gitea Version: 1.25.1 Page: 1065ms Template: 7ms
English
Bahasa Indonesia Deutsch English Español Français Gaeilge Italiano Latviešu Magyar nyelv Nederlands Polski Português de Portugal Português do Brasil Suomi Svenska Türkçe Čeština Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська فارسی മലയാളം 日本語 简体中文 繁體中文(台灣) 繁體中文(香港) 한국어
Licenses API