In D92191, a bunch of test cases were added to check `clang-scan-deps` works in `clang-cl` mode as well. We don't need to duplicate all test cases, though. Testing the few special cases we have in `clang-scan-deps` for `clang-cl` should be good enough: 1. Deducing output path (and therefore target name in our make output). 2. Ignoring `-Xclang` arguments in step 1. 3. Deducing resource directory by invoking the compiler executuable. This test de-duplicates the extra clang-cl test cases. Reviewed By: dexonsmith, saudi Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121812
22 lines
739 B
C++
22 lines
739 B
C++
// RUN: rm -rf %t.dir
|
|
// RUN: rm -rf %t.cdb
|
|
// RUN: mkdir -p %t.dir
|
|
// RUN: cp %s %t.dir/regular_cdb_input.cpp
|
|
// RUN: sed -e "s|DIR|%/t.dir|g" %S/Inputs/regular_cdb.json > %t.cdb
|
|
//
|
|
// RUN: not clang-scan-deps -compilation-database %t.cdb -j 1 2>%t.dir/errs
|
|
// RUN: echo EOF >> %t.dir/errs
|
|
// RUN: FileCheck %s --input-file %t.dir/errs
|
|
|
|
#include "missing.h"
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: Error while scanning dependencies
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: error: no such file or directory:
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: error: no input files
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: error:
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Error while scanning dependencies
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: fatal error: 'missing.h' file not found
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Error while scanning dependencies
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: fatal error: 'missing.h' file not found
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: EOF
|