This is extracted from #94620. While libc++ doesn't have the problem described in that issue, a test case is a good idea to ensure that we don't regress this behavior in the future. This could happen for example if we decide to use `_Complex` in the implementation of `std::complex` while Clang doesn't handle bit_cast with _Complex yet.
37 lines
981 B
C++
37 lines
981 B
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that std::bit_cast works with std::complex. Test case extracted from
|
|
// https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/94620.
|
|
|
|
#include <bit>
|
|
#include <complex>
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
constexpr void test() {
|
|
using Complex = std::complex<T>;
|
|
unsigned char data[sizeof(Complex)] = {0};
|
|
|
|
[[maybe_unused]] Complex c = std::bit_cast<Complex>(data);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
constexpr bool test_all() {
|
|
test<float>();
|
|
test<double>();
|
|
test<long double>();
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**) {
|
|
test_all();
|
|
static_assert(test_all());
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|