Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/infinite-loop.ll
Arthur Eubanks d0acd97c68 [NewPM][LoopUnswitch] Pin loop-unswitch to legacy PM or use simple-loop-unswitch
As mentioned in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143395.html,
loop-unswitch has not been ported to the NPM. Instead people are using
simple-loop-unswitch.

Pin all tests in Transforms/LoopUnswitch to legacy PM and replace all
other uses of loop-unswitch with simple-loop-unswitch.

One test that didn't fit into the above was
2014-06-21-congruent-constant.ll which seems to only pass with
loop-unswitch. That is also pinned to legacy PM.

Now all tests containing "-loop-unswitch" anywhere in the test succeed with
NPM turned on by default.

Reviewed By: ychen

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85360
2020-08-06 10:56:00 -07:00

60 lines
1.8 KiB
LLVM

; REQUIRES: asserts
; RUN: opt -loop-unswitch -enable-new-pm=0 -disable-output -stats -info-output-file - < %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=STATS %s
; RUN: opt -loop-unswitch -enable-new-pm=0 -enable-mssa-loop-dependency=true -verify-memoryssa -disable-output -stats -info-output-file - < %s | FileCheck --check-prefix=STATS %s
; RUN: opt -loop-unswitch -enable-new-pm=0 -simplifycfg -S < %s | FileCheck %s
; PR5373
; Loop unswitching shouldn't trivially unswitch the true case of condition %a
; in the code here because it leads to an infinite loop. While this doesn't
; contain any instructions with side effects, it's still a kind of side effect.
; It can trivially unswitch on the false case of condition %a though.
; STATS: 2 loop-unswitch - Number of branches unswitched
; STATS: 2 loop-unswitch - Number of unswitches that are trivial
; CHECK-LABEL: @func_16(
; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %a, label %entry.split, label %abort0.split
; CHECK: entry.split:
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %b, label %for.body, label %abort1.split
; CHECK: for.body:
; CHECK-NEXT: br label %for.body
; CHECK: abort0.split:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @end0() [[NOR_NUW:#[0-9]+]]
; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
; CHECK: abort1.split:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @end1() [[NOR_NUW]]
; CHECK-NEXT: unreachable
; CHECK: }
define void @func_16(i1 %a, i1 %b) nounwind {
entry:
br label %for.body
for.body:
br i1 %a, label %cond.end, label %abort0
cond.end:
br i1 %b, label %for.body, label %abort1
abort0:
call void @end0() noreturn nounwind
unreachable
abort1:
call void @end1() noreturn nounwind
unreachable
}
declare void @end0() noreturn
declare void @end1() noreturn
; CHECK: attributes #0 = { nounwind }
; CHECK: attributes #1 = { noreturn }
; CHECK: attributes [[NOR_NUW]] = { noreturn nounwind }