Files
clang-p2996/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp
Sirraide 4e600751d2 [Clang] [Tests] Refactor most unit tests to use DynamicRecursiveASTVisitor (#115132)
This pr refactors most tests that use RAV to use DRAV instead; this also
has the nice effect of testing both the RAV and DRAV implementations at
the same time w/o having to duplicate all of our AST visitor tests.

Some tests rely on features that DRAV doesn’t support (mainly post-order
traversal), so those haven’t been migrated. At the same time,
`TestVisitor` is now a DRAV, so I’ve had to introduce a new
`CTRPTestVisitor` for any tests that need to use RAV directly.
2024-11-15 06:17:20 +01:00

116 lines
3.6 KiB
C++

//===- unittest/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp ----------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "TestVisitor.h"
using namespace clang;
namespace {
class DeclRefExprVisitor : public ExpectedLocationVisitor {
public:
DeclRefExprVisitor() { ShouldVisitImplicitCode = false; }
bool VisitDeclRefExpr(DeclRefExpr *Reference) override {
Match(Reference->getNameInfo().getAsString(), Reference->getLocation());
return true;
}
};
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsBaseClassTemplateArguments) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 2, 3);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
"void x(); template <void (*T)()> class X {};\nX<x> y;"));
}
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsCXXForRangeStmtRange) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 2, 25);
Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 2, 30);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
"int x[5];\n"
"void f() { for (int i : x) { x[0] = 1; } }",
DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX11));
}
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsCallExpr) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 1, 22);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
"void x(); void y() { x(); }"));
}
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsExplicitLambdaCaptureInit) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 20);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
"void f() { int i; [i]{}; }",
DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX11));
}
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsUseOfImplicitLambdaCapture) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 24);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
"void f() { int i; [=]{ i; }; }",
DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX11));
}
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsImplicitLambdaCaptureInit) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ShouldVisitImplicitCode = true;
// We're expecting "i" to be visited twice: once for the initialization expr
// for the captured variable "i" outside of the lambda body, and again for
// the use of "i" inside the lambda.
Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 20, /*Times=*/1);
Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 24, /*Times=*/1);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
"void f() { int i; [=]{ i; }; }",
DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX11));
}
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsLambdaInitCaptureInit) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 24);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
"void f() { int i; [a = i + 1]{}; }",
DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX14));
}
/* FIXME: According to Richard Smith this is a bug in the AST.
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsBaseClassTemplateArgumentsInInstantiation) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 3, 43);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
"template <typename T> void x();\n"
"template <void (*T)()> class X {};\n"
"template <typename T> class Y : public X< x<T> > {};\n"
"Y<int> y;"));
}
*/
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsExtension) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ExpectMatch("s", 1, 24);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
"int s = __extension__ (s);\n"));
}
TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsCopyExprOfBlockDeclCapture) {
DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 3, 24);
EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver("void f(int(^)(int)); \n"
"void g() { \n"
" f([&](int x){ return x; }); \n"
"}",
DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_OBJCXX11));
}
} // end anonymous namespace