2238dcc393
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0). If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black. RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
81 lines
2.7 KiB
Python
81 lines
2.7 KiB
Python
import lldb
|
|
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
|
|
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
|
|
from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestCase(TestBase):
|
|
@no_debug_info_test
|
|
def test(self):
|
|
self.build()
|
|
lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(
|
|
self, "// break here", lldb.SBFileSpec("main.cpp")
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
m_val = self.expect_expr(
|
|
"m",
|
|
result_type="WithMember",
|
|
result_children=[ValueCheck(name="i", value="1")],
|
|
)
|
|
# FIXME: The non-display name doesn't include the function, so users
|
|
# can't actually match specific classes by their name. Either document
|
|
# or fix this.
|
|
self.assertEqual(m_val.GetType().GetName(), "WithMember")
|
|
# Try accessing the type in the expression evaluator.
|
|
self.expect_expr("m.i", result_type="int", result_value="1")
|
|
|
|
self.expect_expr(
|
|
"typedef_unnamed",
|
|
result_type="TypedefUnnamed",
|
|
result_children=[ValueCheck(name="a", value="2")],
|
|
)
|
|
self.expect_expr(
|
|
"typedef_unnamed2",
|
|
result_type="TypedefUnnamed2",
|
|
result_children=[ValueCheck(name="b", value="3")],
|
|
)
|
|
self.expect_expr(
|
|
"unnamed",
|
|
result_type="(unnamed struct)",
|
|
result_children=[ValueCheck(name="i", value="4")],
|
|
)
|
|
self.expect_expr(
|
|
"unnamed2",
|
|
result_type="(unnamed struct)",
|
|
result_children=[ValueCheck(name="j", value="5")],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try a class that is only forward declared.
|
|
self.expect_expr("fwd", result_type="Forward *")
|
|
self.expect(
|
|
"expression -- fwd->i",
|
|
error=True,
|
|
substrs=["member access into incomplete type 'Forward'"],
|
|
)
|
|
self.expect(
|
|
"expression -- *fwd",
|
|
error=True,
|
|
substrs=["incomplete type 'Forward' where a complete type is required"],
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
# Try a class that has a name that matches a class in the global scope.
|
|
self.expect_expr("fwd_conflict", result_type="ForwardConflict *")
|
|
# FIXME: This pulls in the unrelated type with the same name from the
|
|
# global scope.
|
|
self.expect(
|
|
"expression -- fwd_conflict->i",
|
|
error=True,
|
|
substrs=[
|
|
# This should point out that ForwardConflict is incomplete.
|
|
"no member named 'i' in 'ForwardConflict'"
|
|
],
|
|
)
|
|
self.expect(
|
|
"expression -- *fwd_conflict",
|
|
error=True,
|
|
substrs=[
|
|
# This should fail to parse instead.
|
|
"couldn't read its memory"
|
|
],
|
|
)
|