31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
37 lines
1.0 KiB
C++
37 lines
1.0 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
// Because we don't have a functioning decltype in C++03
|
|
|
|
// <memory>
|
|
|
|
// unique_ptr
|
|
|
|
// template<class CharT, class Traits, class Y, class D>
|
|
// basic_ostream<CharT, Traits>&
|
|
// operator<<(basic_ostream<CharT, Traits>& os, const unique_ptr<Y, D>& p);
|
|
|
|
// -?- Remarks: This function shall not participate in overload resolution unless os << p.get() is a valid expression.
|
|
|
|
#include <memory>
|
|
#include <sstream>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
#include "min_allocator.h"
|
|
#include "deleter_types.h"
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
std::unique_ptr<int, PointerDeleter<int>> p;
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
os << p; // expected-error {{invalid operands to binary expression}}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|