LLVM currently treats the first operand of MVCK as if it were a
regular base+index+displacement address. However, it is in fact
a base+displacement combined with a length register field.
While the two might look syntactically similar, there are two
semantic differences:
- %r0 is a valid length register, even though it cannot be used
as an index register.
- In an expression with just a single register like 0(%rX), the
register is treated as base with normal addresses, while it is
treated as the length register (with an empty base) for MVCK.
Fixed by adding a new operand parser class BDRAddr and reworking
the assembler parser to distinguish between address + length
register operands and regular addresses.
llvm-svn: 285574
ec5d779eb8