e8049dc3c8
Expanding from D94808 - we ensure the same InlineAdvisor is used by both InlinerPass instances. The notion of mandatory inlining is moved into the core InlineAdvisor: advisors anyway have to handle that case, so this change also factors out that a bit better. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94825
21 lines
1.1 KiB
C
21 lines
1.1 KiB
C
// Verify that remarks for the inliner appear. The remarks under the new PM will
|
|
// be slightly different than those emitted by the legacy PM. The new PM inliner
|
|
// also doesnot appear to be added at O0, so we test at O1.
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Rpass=inline -Rpass-analysis=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -O1 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -emit-llvm-only -mllvm -mandatory-inlining-first=false -verify
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -Rpass=inline -Rpass-analysis=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -O1 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -emit-llvm-only -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only -mllvm -mandatory-inlining-first=false -verify
|
|
|
|
int foo(int x, int y) __attribute__((always_inline));
|
|
int foo(int x, int y) { return x + y; }
|
|
|
|
float foz(int x, int y) __attribute__((noinline));
|
|
float foz(int x, int y) { return x * y; }
|
|
|
|
// The negative diagnostics are emitted twice because the inliner runs
|
|
// twice.
|
|
//
|
|
int bar(int j) {
|
|
// expected-remark@+2 {{foz not inlined into bar because it should never be inlined (cost=never)}}
|
|
// expected-remark@+1 {{foo inlined into bar}}
|
|
return foo(j, j - 2) * foz(j - 2, j);
|
|
}
|