C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
34 lines
966 B
C++
34 lines
966 B
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: !libc++ && c++11
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: !libc++ && c++14
|
|
// <charconv>
|
|
|
|
// In
|
|
//
|
|
// from_chars_result from_chars(const char* first, const char* last,
|
|
// Integral& value, int base = 10)
|
|
//
|
|
// Integral cannot be bool.
|
|
|
|
#include <charconv>
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
using std::from_chars;
|
|
char buf[] = "01001";
|
|
bool lv;
|
|
|
|
from_chars(buf, buf + sizeof(buf), lv); // expected-error {{call to deleted function}}
|
|
from_chars(buf, buf + sizeof(buf), lv, 16); // expected-error {{call to deleted function}}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|