31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
29 lines
900 B
C++
29 lines
900 B
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
|
|
|
|
// type_traits
|
|
|
|
// is_convertible
|
|
|
|
// Test the fallback implementation.
|
|
|
|
// libc++ provides a fallback implementation of the compiler trait
|
|
// `__is_convertible` with the same name when clang doesn't.
|
|
// Because this test forces the use of the fallback even when clang provides
|
|
// it causing a keyword incompatibility.
|
|
#if defined(__clang__)
|
|
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wkeyword-compat"
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
#define _LIBCPP_USE_IS_CONVERTIBLE_FALLBACK
|
|
#include "is_convertible.pass.cpp"
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|