b37a349ff2
Whilst migrating/retiring some downstream testing, I came across a test for weak undef IE and LD TLS references, but was unable to find any equivalent in LLD's upstream testing. There does seem to be some slight subtle differences that could be worth testing compared to LE TLS references, in particular that IE can be relaxed to LE in this case, hence this change. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95124 Reviewed by: grimar, MaskRay
43 lines
1.2 KiB
ArmAsm
43 lines
1.2 KiB
ArmAsm
# REQUIRES: x86
|
|
|
|
# RUN: split-file %s %t
|
|
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64 %t/exec.s -o %texec.o
|
|
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64 %t/shared.s -o %tshared.o
|
|
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64 %t/ledef.s -o %tdef.o
|
|
# RUN: ld.lld %texec.o -o %t.exec
|
|
# RUN: ld.lld %tshared.o -o %t.shared --shared
|
|
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d %t.exec | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXEC
|
|
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d %t.shared | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SHARED
|
|
|
|
## An undefined weak TLS symbol does not fetch a lazy definition.
|
|
# RUN: ld.lld %texec.o --start-lib %tdef.o --end-lib -o %tlazy
|
|
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d %tlazy | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=EXEC
|
|
|
|
## Undefined TLS symbols arbitrarily resolve to 0.
|
|
# EXEC: leaq 16(%rax), %rdx
|
|
## Initial-exec references to undefined weak symbols can be relaxed to LE
|
|
## references.
|
|
# EXEC: leaq 32(%rax), %rax
|
|
# SHARED: leaq 48(%rax), %rcx
|
|
|
|
# RUN: ld.lld -shared %tdef.o -o %tdef.so
|
|
# RUN: not ld.lld %texec.o %tdef.so -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR %s
|
|
|
|
# ERROR: symbol 'le' has no type
|
|
|
|
#--- ledef.s
|
|
.tbss
|
|
.globl le
|
|
le:
|
|
|
|
#--- exec.s
|
|
.weak le
|
|
leaq le@tpoff+16(%rax), %rdx
|
|
|
|
.weak ie
|
|
addq ie@gottpoff+32(%rip), %rax
|
|
|
|
#--- shared.s
|
|
.weak ld
|
|
leaq ld@dtpoff+48(%rax), %rcx
|