Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/how-far-to-zero.ll
Arthur Eubanks 9adbb5cb3a [SCEV] Fix ScalarEvolution tests under NPM
Many tests use opt's -analyze feature, which does not translate well to
NPM and has better alternatives. The alternative here is to explicitly
add a pass that calls ScalarEvolution::print().

The legacy pass manager RUNs aren't changing, but they are now pinned to
the legacy pass manager.  For each legacy pass manager RUN, I added a
corresponding NPM RUN using the 'print<scalar-evolution>' pass. For
compatibility with update_analyze_test_checks.py and existing test
CHECKs, 'print<scalar-evolution>' now prints what -analyze prints per
function.

This was generated by the following Python script and failures were
manually fixed up:

import sys
for i in sys.argv:
    with open(i, 'r') as f:
        s = f.read()
    with open(i, 'w') as f:
        for l in s.splitlines():
            if "RUN:" in l and ' -analyze ' in l and '\\' not in l:
                f.write(l.replace(' -analyze ', ' -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 '))
                f.write('\n')
                f.write(l.replace(' -analyze ', ' -disable-output ').replace(' -scalar-evolution ', ' "-passes=print<scalar-evolution>" ').replace(" | ", " 2>&1 | "))
                f.write('\n')
            else:
                f.write(l)

There are a couple failures still in ScalarEvolution under NPM, but
those are due to other unrelated naming conflicts.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83798
2020-07-16 11:24:07 -07:00

29 lines
1.1 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -analyze -enable-new-pm=0 -scalar-evolution | FileCheck %s
; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<scalar-evolution>" 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
; PR13228
define void @f() nounwind uwtable readnone {
entry:
br label %for.cond
for.cond: ; preds = %for.cond, %entry
%c.0 = phi i8 [ 1, %entry ], [ 0, %for.cond ]
%i.0 = phi i8 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.cond ]
%lnot = icmp eq i8 %i.0, 0
%inc = add i8 %i.0, 1
br i1 %lnot, label %for.cond, label %while.cond
while.cond: ; preds = %while.body, %for.cond
%b.2 = phi i8 [ %add, %while.body ], [ 0, %for.cond ]
br i1 undef, label %while.end, label %while.body
while.body: ; preds = %while.cond
%add = add i8 %b.2, %c.0
%tobool7 = icmp eq i8 %add, 0
br i1 %tobool7, label %while.end, label %while.cond
while.end: ; preds = %while.body, %while.cond
ret void
}
;CHECK: Loop %while.cond: <multiple exits> Unpredictable backedge-taken count.