Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/machine-outliner-bti.mir
Momchil Velikov a88c722e68 [AArch64] PAC/BTI code generation for LLVM generated functions
PAC/BTI-related codegen in the AArch64 backend is controlled by a set
of LLVM IR function attributes, added to the function by Clang, based
on command-line options and GCC-style function attributes. However,
functions, generated in the LLVM middle end (for example,
asan.module.ctor or __llvm_gcov_write_out) do not get any attributes
and the backend incorrectly does not do any PAC/BTI code generation.

This patch record the default state of PAC/BTI codegen in a set of
LLVM IR module-level attributes, based on command-line options:

* "sign-return-address", with non-zero value means generate code to
  sign return addresses (PAC-RET), zero value means disable PAC-RET.

* "sign-return-address-all", with non-zero value means enable PAC-RET
  for all functions, zero value means enable PAC-RET only for
  functions, which spill LR.

* "sign-return-address-with-bkey", with non-zero value means use B-key
  for signing, zero value mean use A-key.

This set of attributes are always added for AArch64 targets (as
opposed, for example, to interpreting a missing attribute as having a
value 0) in order to be able to check for conflicts when combining
module attributed during LTO.

Module-level attributes are overridden by function level attributes.
All the decision making about whether to not to generate PAC and/or
BTI code is factored out into AArch64FunctionInfo, there shouldn't be
any places left, other than AArch64FunctionInfo, which directly
examine PAC/BTI attributes, except AArch64AsmPrinter.cpp, which
is/will-be handled by a separate patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85649
2020-09-25 11:47:14 +01:00

45 lines
1.7 KiB
YAML

# RUN: llc -mtriple=aarch64--- -run-pass=prologepilog -run-pass=machine-outliner -verify-machineinstrs %s -o - | FileCheck %s
# AArch64 Branch Target Enforcement treats the BR and BLR indirect branch
# instructions differently. The BLR instruction can only target a BTI C
# instruction, and the BR instruction can only target a BTI J instruction. We
# always start indirectly-called functions with BTI C, so the outliner must not
# transform a BLR instruction into a BR instruction.
# There is an exception to this: BR X16 and BR X17 can also target a BTI C
# instruction. We make of this for general tail-calls (tested elsewhere), but
# don't currently make use of this in the outliner.
# CHECK-NOT: OUTLINED_FUNCTION_
--- |
@g = hidden local_unnamed_addr global i32 0, align 4
define hidden void @bar(void ()* nocapture %f) "branch-target-enforcement"="true" {
entry:
ret void
}
declare void @foo()
...
---
name: bar
tracksRegLiveness: true
body: |
bb.0.entry:
liveins: $x20, $x21, $lr, $x19
HINT 34
STRWui renamable $w21, renamable $x20, target-flags(aarch64-pageoff, aarch64-nc) @g :: (store 4 into @g)
BLR renamable $x19, csr_aarch64_aapcs, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $sp
STRWui renamable $w21, renamable $x20, target-flags(aarch64-pageoff, aarch64-nc) @g :: (store 4 into @g)
BLR renamable $x19, csr_aarch64_aapcs, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $sp
STRWui killed renamable $w21, killed renamable $x20, target-flags(aarch64-pageoff, aarch64-nc) @g :: (store 4 into @g)
BLR killed renamable $x19, csr_aarch64_aapcs, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $sp
TCRETURNdi @foo, 0, csr_aarch64_aapcs, implicit $sp
...