Files
clang-p2996/polly/test/ForwardOpTree/noforward_synthesizable_unknownit.ll
Michael Kruse 9f6e41cdba [ForwardOpTree] Support synthesizable values.
This allows -polly-optree to move instructions that depend on
synthesizable values.

The difficulty for synthesizable values is that their value depends on
the location. When it is moved over a loop header, and the SCEV
expression depends on the loop induction variable (SCEVAddRecExpr), it
would use the current induction variable instead of the last one.

At the moment we cannot forward PHI nodes such that crossing the header
of loops referenced by SCEVAddRecExpr is not possible (assuming the loop
header has at least two incoming blocks: for entering the loop and the
backedge, such any instruction to be forwarded must have a phi between
use and definition).

A remaining issue is when the forwarded value is used after the loop,
but is only synthesizable inside the loop. This happens e.g. if
ScalarEvolution is unable to determine the number of loop iterations or
the initial loop value. We do not forward in this situation.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36102

llvm-svn: 309609
2017-07-31 19:46:21 +00:00

51 lines
1.4 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-optree -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s -match-full-lines
;
; Do not try to forward %i.trunc, it is not synthesizable in %body.
;
define void @func(i32 %n, i32* noalias nonnull %A) {
entry:
br label %for
for:
%j = phi i32 [0, %entry], [%j.inc, %inc]
%j.cmp = icmp slt i32 %j, %n
%zero = sext i32 0 to i64
br i1 %j.cmp, label %inner.for, label %exit
; This loop has some unusual properties:
; * It has a known iteration count (8), therefore SCoP-compatible.
; * %i.trunc is synthesizable within the loop ({1,+,1}<%while.body>).
; * %i.trunc is not synthesizable outside of the loop, because its value is
; unknown when exiting.
; (should be 8, but ScalarEvolution currently seems unable to derive that)
;
; ScalarEvolution currently seems to not able to handle the %zero.
; If it becomes more intelligent, there might be other such loop constructs.
inner.for:
%i = phi i64 [%zero, %for], [%i.inc, %inner.for]
%i.inc = add nuw nsw i64 %i, 1
%i.trunc = trunc i64 %i.inc to i32
%i.and = and i32 %i.trunc, 7
%inner.cond = icmp eq i32 %i.and, 0
br i1 %inner.cond, label %body, label %inner.for
body:
store i32 %i.trunc, i32* %A
br label %inc
inc:
%j.inc = add nuw nsw i32 %j, 1
br label %for
exit:
br label %return
return:
ret void
}
; CHECK: ForwardOpTree executed, but did not modify anything