a3093bfb3e
This should use -> instead of '.', but the fix-it functionality of the expression evaluator saved us here. Let's use the proper syntax in the first place as we don't want to test fix-its here.
34 lines
1.7 KiB
Python
34 lines
1.7 KiB
Python
import lldb
|
|
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
|
|
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
|
|
from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
|
|
|
|
class TestCase(TestBase):
|
|
|
|
mydir = TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__)
|
|
|
|
def test_constructors(self):
|
|
self.build()
|
|
lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(self,"// break here", lldb.SBFileSpec("main.cpp"))
|
|
self.expect_expr("ClassWithImplicitCtor().foo()", result_type="int", result_value="1")
|
|
self.expect_expr("ClassWithOneCtor(2).value", result_type="int", result_value="2")
|
|
self.expect_expr("ClassWithMultipleCtor(3).value", result_type="int", result_value="3")
|
|
self.expect_expr("ClassWithMultipleCtor(3, 1).value", result_type="int", result_value="4")
|
|
|
|
self.expect_expr("ClassWithDeletedCtor().value", result_type="int", result_value="6")
|
|
self.expect_expr("ClassWithDeletedDefaultCtor(7).value", result_type="int", result_value="7")
|
|
|
|
# FIXME: It seems we try to call the non-existent default constructor here which is wrong.
|
|
self.expect("expr ClassWithDefaultedCtor().foo()", error=True, substrs="Couldn't lookup symbols:")
|
|
|
|
# FIXME: Calling deleted constructors should fail before linking.
|
|
self.expect("expr ClassWithDeletedCtor(1).value", error=True, substrs=["Couldn't lookup symbols:"])
|
|
self.expect("expr ClassWithDeletedDefaultCtor().value", error=True, substrs=["Couldn't lookup symbols:"])
|
|
|
|
@skipIfLinux # Fails on some Linux systems with SIGABRT.
|
|
def test_constructors_new(self):
|
|
self.build()
|
|
lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(self,"// break here", lldb.SBFileSpec("main.cpp"))
|
|
|
|
self.expect_expr("(new ClassWithOneCtor(1))->value; 1", result_type="int", result_value="1")
|