ae818501b7
This assert is intended to defend against backtracking into the middle of a sequence of tokens that is being replaced with an annotation, but it's OK if we backtrack to the exact position of the start of the annotation sequence. Use a <= comparison instead of <. Fixes PR25946 llvm-svn: 284777
18 lines
703 B
C++
18 lines
703 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify %s
|
|
|
|
// PR25946
|
|
// We had an off-by-one error in an assertion when annotating A<int> below. Our
|
|
// error recovery checks if A<int> is a constructor declarator, and opens a
|
|
// TentativeParsingAction. Then we attempt to annotate the token at the exact
|
|
// position that we want to possibly backtrack to, and this used to crash.
|
|
|
|
template <typename T> class A {};
|
|
|
|
// expected-error@+1 {{expected '{' after base class list}}
|
|
template <typename T> class B : T // not ',' or '{'
|
|
// expected-error@+3 {{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}}
|
|
// expected-error@+2 {{expected ';' after top level declarator}}
|
|
// expected-error@+1 {{expected ';' after class}}
|
|
A<int> {
|
|
};
|