Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/if-pred-stores.ll
Matthew Simpson c62266d680 [LV] Sink scalar operands of predicated instructions
When we predicate an instruction (div, rem, store) we place the instruction in
its own basic block within the vectorized loop. If a predicated instruction has
scalar operands, it's possible to recursively sink these scalar expressions
into the predicated block so that they might avoid execution. This patch sinks
as much scalar computation as possible into predicated blocks. We previously
were able to sink such operands only if they were extractelement instructions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25632

llvm-svn: 285097
2016-10-25 18:59:45 +00:00

133 lines
5.0 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt -S -vectorize-num-stores-pred=1 -force-vector-width=1 -force-vector-interleave=2 -loop-vectorize -verify-loop-info -simplifycfg < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=UNROLL
; RUN: opt -S -vectorize-num-stores-pred=1 -force-vector-width=1 -force-vector-interleave=2 -loop-vectorize -verify-loop-info < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=UNROLL-NOSIMPLIFY
; RUN: opt -S -vectorize-num-stores-pred=1 -force-vector-width=2 -force-vector-interleave=1 -loop-vectorize -enable-cond-stores-vec -verify-loop-info -simplifycfg < %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=VEC
target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
; Test predication of stores.
define i32 @test(i32* nocapture %f) #0 {
entry:
br label %for.body
; VEC-LABEL: test
; VEC: %[[v0:.+]] = add i64 %index, 0
; VEC: %[[v8:.+]] = icmp sgt <2 x i32> %{{.*}}, <i32 100, i32 100>
; VEC: %[[v9:.+]] = add nsw <2 x i32> %{{.*}}, <i32 20, i32 20>
; VEC: %[[v10:.+]] = and <2 x i1> %[[v8]], <i1 true, i1 true>
; VEC: %[[o1:.+]] = or <2 x i1> zeroinitializer, %[[v10]]
; VEC: %[[v11:.+]] = extractelement <2 x i1> %[[o1]], i32 0
; VEC: %[[v12:.+]] = icmp eq i1 %[[v11]], true
; VEC: br i1 %[[v12]], label %[[cond:.+]], label %[[else:.+]]
;
; VEC: [[cond]]:
; VEC: %[[v13:.+]] = extractelement <2 x i32> %[[v9]], i32 0
; VEC: %[[v2:.+]] = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %f, i64 %[[v0]]
; VEC: store i32 %[[v13]], i32* %[[v2]], align 4
; VEC: br label %[[else:.+]]
;
; VEC: [[else]]:
; VEC: %[[v15:.+]] = extractelement <2 x i1> %[[o1]], i32 1
; VEC: %[[v16:.+]] = icmp eq i1 %[[v15]], true
; VEC: br i1 %[[v16]], label %[[cond2:.+]], label %[[else2:.+]]
;
; VEC: [[cond2]]:
; VEC: %[[v17:.+]] = extractelement <2 x i32> %[[v9]], i32 1
; VEC: %[[v1:.+]] = add i64 %index, 1
; VEC: %[[v4:.+]] = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %f, i64 %[[v1]]
; VEC: store i32 %[[v17]], i32* %[[v4]], align 4
; VEC: br label %[[else2:.+]]
;
; VEC: [[else2]]:
; UNROLL-LABEL: test
; UNROLL: vector.body:
; UNROLL: %[[IND:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = add i64 %{{.*}}, 0
; UNROLL: %[[IND1:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = add i64 %{{.*}}, 1
; UNROLL: %[[v0:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %f, i64 %[[IND]]
; UNROLL: %[[v1:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %f, i64 %[[IND1]]
; UNROLL: %[[v2:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = load i32, i32* %[[v0]], align 4
; UNROLL: %[[v3:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = load i32, i32* %[[v1]], align 4
; UNROLL: %[[v4:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = icmp sgt i32 %[[v2]], 100
; UNROLL: %[[v5:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = icmp sgt i32 %[[v3]], 100
; UNROLL: %[[o1:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = or i1 false, %[[v4]]
; UNROLL: %[[o2:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = or i1 false, %[[v5]]
; UNROLL: %[[v8:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = icmp eq i1 %[[o1]], true
; UNROLL: br i1 %[[v8]], label %[[cond:[a-zA-Z0-9.]+]], label %[[else:[a-zA-Z0-9.]+]]
;
; UNROLL: [[cond]]:
; UNROLL: %[[v6:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = add nsw i32 %[[v2]], 20
; UNROLL: store i32 %[[v6]], i32* %[[v0]], align 4
; UNROLL: br label %[[else]]
;
; UNROLL: [[else]]:
; UNROLL: %[[v9:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = icmp eq i1 %[[o2]], true
; UNROLL: br i1 %[[v9]], label %[[cond2:[a-zA-Z0-9.]+]], label %[[else2:[a-zA-Z0-9.]+]]
;
; UNROLL: [[cond2]]:
; UNROLL: %[[v7:[a-zA-Z0-9]+]] = add nsw i32 %[[v3]], 20
; UNROLL: store i32 %[[v7]], i32* %[[v1]], align 4
; UNROLL: br label %[[else2]]
;
; UNROLL: [[else2]]:
for.body:
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.inc ]
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32, i32* %f, i64 %indvars.iv
%0 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
%cmp1 = icmp sgt i32 %0, 100
br i1 %cmp1, label %if.then, label %for.inc
if.then:
%add = add nsw i32 %0, 20
store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx, align 4
br label %for.inc
for.inc:
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%exitcond = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, 128
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
for.end:
ret i32 0
}
; Track basic blocks when unrolling conditional blocks. This code used to assert
; because we did not update the phi nodes with the proper predecessor in the
; vectorized loop body.
; PR18724
; UNROLL-NOSIMPLIFY-LABEL: bug18724
; UNROLL-NOSIMPLIFY: store i32
; UNROLL-NOSIMPLIFY: store i32
define void @bug18724() {
entry:
br label %for.body9
for.body9:
br i1 undef, label %for.inc26, label %for.body14
for.body14:
%indvars.iv3 = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next4, %for.inc23 ], [ undef, %for.body9 ]
%iNewChunks.120 = phi i32 [ %iNewChunks.2, %for.inc23 ], [ undef, %for.body9 ]
%arrayidx16 = getelementptr inbounds [768 x i32], [768 x i32]* undef, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv3
%tmp = load i32, i32* %arrayidx16, align 4
br i1 undef, label %if.then18, label %for.inc23
if.then18:
store i32 2, i32* %arrayidx16, align 4
%inc21 = add nsw i32 %iNewChunks.120, 1
br label %for.inc23
for.inc23:
%iNewChunks.2 = phi i32 [ %inc21, %if.then18 ], [ %iNewChunks.120, %for.body14 ]
%indvars.iv.next4 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv3, 1
%tmp1 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv3 to i32
%cmp13 = icmp slt i32 %tmp1, 0
br i1 %cmp13, label %for.body14, label %for.inc26
for.inc26:
%iNewChunks.1.lcssa = phi i32 [ undef, %for.body9 ], [ %iNewChunks.2, %for.inc23 ]
unreachable
}