62ae01201f
`10000000` unlikely uncovers new cases in the code, but probably causing OOM before leak detection.
34 lines
889 B
C++
34 lines
889 B
C++
// Test for LeakSanitizer+AddressSanitizer of different sizes.
|
|
// REQUIRES: leak-detection
|
|
//
|
|
// RUN: %clangxx_asan -O0 %s -o %t
|
|
// RUN: not %run %t 0 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
// RUN: not %run %t 1 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
// RUN: not %run %t 1000 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
// RUN: not %run %t 1000000 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
#include <cstdlib>
|
|
#include <thread>
|
|
|
|
__attribute__((noopt)) void leak(int n) {
|
|
#if defined(__ANDROID__) || defined(__BIONIC__)
|
|
// Bionic does not acutally allocate when n==0, hence
|
|
// there would not be a leak.
|
|
// Re-adjust n so the test can pass.
|
|
if (n == 0)
|
|
n = 1;
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
// Repeat few times to make sure that at least one pointer is
|
|
// not somewhere on the stack.
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
|
|
volatile int *t = new int[n];
|
|
t = nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
|
|
leak(atoi(argv[1]));
|
|
}
|
|
// CHECK: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
|