ad4a582fd9
Some targets (e.g. PPC and Hexagon) already did this. I think it's best to do this consistently so that frontend authors don't run into inconsistent results when they emit `naked` functions. For example, in Zig, we had to change our emit code to also set `frame-pointer=none` to get reliable results across targets. Note: I don't have commit access.
42 lines
1.5 KiB
C++
42 lines
1.5 KiB
C++
//===-- BPFFrameLowering.cpp - BPF Frame Information ----------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// This file contains the BPF implementation of TargetFrameLowering class.
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "BPFFrameLowering.h"
|
|
#include "BPFInstrInfo.h"
|
|
#include "BPFSubtarget.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFrameInfo.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
bool BPFFrameLowering::hasFPImpl(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void BPFFrameLowering::emitPrologue(MachineFunction &MF,
|
|
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) const {}
|
|
|
|
void BPFFrameLowering::emitEpilogue(MachineFunction &MF,
|
|
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) const {}
|
|
|
|
void BPFFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves(MachineFunction &MF,
|
|
BitVector &SavedRegs,
|
|
RegScavenger *RS) const {
|
|
TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves(MF, SavedRegs, RS);
|
|
SavedRegs.reset(BPF::R6);
|
|
SavedRegs.reset(BPF::R7);
|
|
SavedRegs.reset(BPF::R8);
|
|
SavedRegs.reset(BPF::R9);
|
|
}
|