ad4a582fd9
Some targets (e.g. PPC and Hexagon) already did this. I think it's best to do this consistently so that frontend authors don't run into inconsistent results when they emit `naked` functions. For example, in Zig, we had to change our emit code to also set `frame-pointer=none` to get reliable results across targets. Note: I don't have commit access.
29 lines
870 B
LLVM
29 lines
870 B
LLVM
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple s390x | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=CHECK
|
|
|
|
declare dso_local void @main()
|
|
|
|
define dso_local void @naked() naked "frame-pointer"="all" {
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: naked:
|
|
; CHECK: # %bb.0:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: brasl %r14, main@PLT
|
|
call void @main()
|
|
unreachable
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define dso_local void @normal() "frame-pointer"="all" {
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: normal:
|
|
; CHECK: # %bb.0:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: stmg %r11, %r15, 88(%r15)
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_offset %r11, -72
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_offset %r14, -48
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_offset %r15, -40
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: aghi %r15, -160
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 320
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: lgr %r11, %r15
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_register %r11
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: brasl %r14, main@PLT
|
|
call void @main()
|
|
unreachable
|
|
}
|