ad4a582fd9
Some targets (e.g. PPC and Hexagon) already did this. I think it's best to do this consistently so that frontend authors don't run into inconsistent results when they emit `naked` functions. For example, in Zig, we had to change our emit code to also set `frame-pointer=none` to get reliable results across targets. Note: I don't have commit access.
32 lines
940 B
LLVM
32 lines
940 B
LLVM
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -march xcore | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=CHECK
|
|
|
|
declare dso_local void @main()
|
|
|
|
define dso_local void @naked() naked "frame-pointer"="all" {
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: naked:
|
|
; CHECK: # %bb.0:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: bl main
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cc_bottom naked.function
|
|
call void @main()
|
|
unreachable
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
define dso_local void @normal() "frame-pointer"="all" {
|
|
; CHECK-LABEL: normal:
|
|
; CHECK: # %bb.0:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: entsp 2
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_offset 15, 0
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: stw r10, sp[1] # 4-byte Folded Spill
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_offset 10, -4
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ldaw r10, sp[0]
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cfi_def_cfa_register 10
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: extsp 1
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: bl main
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ldaw sp, sp[1]
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: .cc_bottom normal.function
|
|
call void @main()
|
|
unreachable
|
|
}
|