da233838c9
cl.exe doesn't understand it; there's /Od instead. See also the review thread for r229575. Update lots of compiler-rt tests to use -Od instead of -O0. Ran `rg -l 'clang_cl.*O0' compiler-rt/test/ | xargs sed -i -c 's/-O0/-Od/'` Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64506 llvm-svn: 365724
26 lines
907 B
C++
26 lines
907 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cl_asan -Od %s -Fe%t
|
|
// RUN: not %run %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
#include <malloc.h>
|
|
|
|
int main() {
|
|
int *x = new int[42];
|
|
delete [] x;
|
|
delete [] x;
|
|
// CHECK: AddressSanitizer: attempting double-free on [[ADDR:0x[0-9a-f]+]]
|
|
// FIXME: The 'operator delete' frame should have [].
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {{#0 .* operator delete}}
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {{#1 .* main .*double_operator_delete.cc}}:[[@LINE-4]]
|
|
// CHECK: [[ADDR]] is located 0 bytes inside of 168-byte region
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: freed by thread T0 here:
|
|
// FIXME: The 'operator delete' frame should have [].
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {{#0 .* operator delete}}
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {{#1 .* main .*double_operator_delete.cc}}:[[@LINE-10]]
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: previously allocated by thread T0 here:
|
|
// FIXME: The 'operator new' frame should have [].
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {{#0 .* operator new}}
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: {{#1 .* main .*double_operator_delete.cc}}:[[@LINE-15]]
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|