230adfa96c
LLDB does not support this DWARF5 form atm. At least gcc emits it in some cases when doing optimization for abbreviations. As far I can tell, clang does not support it yet, though the rest LLVM code already knows about it. The patch adds the support. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52689 llvm-svn: 344328
34 lines
777 B
Plaintext
34 lines
777 B
Plaintext
# RUN: yaml2obj %p/Inputs/implicit_const_form_support.yaml > %ttest
|
|
# RUN: lldb-test breakpoints %ttest %s | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
## The intention of the test is to check that DW_FORM_implicit_const
|
|
## is supported and handled properly.
|
|
|
|
## About implicit_const_form_support.yaml:
|
|
## The following invocation and code were used to produce the binary
|
|
## which was converted to yaml and reduced:
|
|
## gcc version 8.0.1 20180319 (experimental) (GCC)
|
|
##
|
|
## g++ test.cpp -g -gdwarf-5 -o test
|
|
##
|
|
## // test.cpp
|
|
## int foo1() {
|
|
## return 0;
|
|
## }
|
|
##
|
|
## int foo2() {
|
|
## return 0;
|
|
## }
|
|
##
|
|
## int main() {
|
|
## return foo1() + foo2();
|
|
## }
|
|
|
|
b foo1
|
|
# CHECK-LABEL: b foo1
|
|
# CHECK: Address: {{.*}}foo1() at test.cpp:2:9
|
|
|
|
b foo2
|
|
# CHECK-LABEL: b foo2
|
|
# CHECK: Address: {{.*}}foo2() at test.cpp:6:9
|