Summary: Currently the dependence analysis in LLVM is unable to compute accurate dependence vectors for multi-dimensional fixed size arrays. This is mainly because the delinearization algorithm in scalar evolution relies on parametric terms to be present in the access functions. In the case of fixed size arrays such parametric terms are not present, but we can use the indexes from GEP instructions to recover the subscripts for each dimension of the arrays. This patch adds this ability under the existing option `-da-disable-delinearization-checks`. Authored By: bmahjour Reviewer: Meinersbur, sebpop, fhahn, dmgreen, grosser, etiotto, bollu Reviewed By: Meinersbur Subscribers: hiraditya, arphaman, Whitney, ppc-slack, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72178
259 lines
9.4 KiB
LLVM
259 lines
9.4 KiB
LLVM
; Test optimization remarks generated by the LoopInterchange pass.
|
|
;
|
|
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-info \
|
|
; RUN: -pass-remarks-output=%t -pass-remarks-missed='loop-interchange' \
|
|
; RUN: -pass-remarks='loop-interchange' -S
|
|
; RUN: cat %t | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
; RUN: opt < %s -basicaa -loop-interchange -verify-dom-info -verify-loop-info \
|
|
; RUN: -pass-remarks-output=%t -pass-remarks-missed='loop-interchange' \
|
|
; RUN: -pass-remarks='loop-interchange' -S -da-disable-delinearization-checks
|
|
; RUN: cat %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=DELIN %s
|
|
|
|
@A = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
|
|
@B = common global [100 x [100 x i32]] zeroinitializer
|
|
@C = common global [100 x i32] zeroinitializer
|
|
|
|
;;---------------------------------------Test case 01---------------------------------
|
|
;; Loops interchange is not profitable.
|
|
;; for(int i=1;i<N;i++)
|
|
;; for(int j=1;j<N;j++)
|
|
;; A[i-1][j-1] = A[i - 1][j-1] + B[i][j];
|
|
|
|
define void @test01(i32 %N){
|
|
entry:
|
|
%cmp31 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 1
|
|
br i1 %cmp31, label %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph, label %for.end19
|
|
|
|
for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph:
|
|
%0 = add i32 %N, -1
|
|
br label %for.body3.lr.ph
|
|
|
|
for.body3.lr.ph:
|
|
%indvars.iv34 = phi i64 [ 1, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next35, %for.inc17 ]
|
|
%1 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv34, -1
|
|
br label %for.body3
|
|
|
|
for.body3:
|
|
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 1, %for.body3.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ]
|
|
%2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, -1
|
|
%arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %1, i64 %2
|
|
%3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx6
|
|
%arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @B, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv34, i64 %indvars.iv
|
|
%4 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx10
|
|
%add = add nsw i32 %4, %3
|
|
store i32 %add, i32* %arrayidx6
|
|
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
|
|
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
|
|
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc17, label %for.body3
|
|
|
|
for.inc17:
|
|
%indvars.iv.next35 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv34, 1
|
|
%lftr.wideiv37 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv34 to i32
|
|
%exitcond38 = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv37, %0
|
|
br i1 %exitcond38, label %for.end19, label %for.body3.lr.ph
|
|
|
|
for.end19:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: --- !Missed
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Pass: loop-interchange
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Name: Dependence
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Function: test01
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Args:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: - String: Cannot interchange loops due to dependences.
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ...
|
|
|
|
; DELIN: --- !Missed
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Pass: loop-interchange
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Name: InterchangeNotProfitable
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Function: test01
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Args:
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: - String: 'Interchanging loops is too costly (cost='
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: - Cost: '2'
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: - String: ', threshold='
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: - Threshold: '0'
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: - String: ') and it does not improve parallelism.'
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: ...
|
|
|
|
;;--------------------------------------Test case 02------------------------------------
|
|
;; [FIXME] This loop though valid is currently not interchanged due to the
|
|
;; limitation that we cannot split the inner loop latch due to multiple use of inner induction
|
|
;; variable.(used to increment the loop counter and to access A[j+1][i+1]
|
|
;; for(int i=0;i<N-1;i++)
|
|
;; for(int j=1;j<N-1;j++)
|
|
;; A[j+1][i+1] = A[j+1][i+1] + k;
|
|
|
|
define void @test02(i32 %k, i32 %N) {
|
|
entry:
|
|
%sub = add nsw i32 %N, -1
|
|
%cmp26 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 1
|
|
br i1 %cmp26, label %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph, label %for.end17
|
|
|
|
for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph:
|
|
%cmp324 = icmp sgt i32 %sub, 1
|
|
%0 = add i32 %N, -2
|
|
%1 = sext i32 %sub to i64
|
|
br label %for.cond1.preheader
|
|
|
|
for.cond.loopexit:
|
|
%cmp = icmp slt i64 %indvars.iv.next29, %1
|
|
br i1 %cmp, label %for.cond1.preheader, label %for.end17
|
|
|
|
for.cond1.preheader:
|
|
%indvars.iv28 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.cond1.preheader.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next29, %for.cond.loopexit ]
|
|
%indvars.iv.next29 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv28, 1
|
|
br i1 %cmp324, label %for.body4, label %for.cond.loopexit
|
|
|
|
for.body4:
|
|
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body4 ], [ 1, %for.cond1.preheader ]
|
|
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
|
|
%arrayidx7 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv.next, i64 %indvars.iv.next29
|
|
%2 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx7
|
|
%add8 = add nsw i32 %2, %k
|
|
store i32 %add8, i32* %arrayidx7
|
|
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
|
|
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.cond.loopexit, label %for.body4
|
|
|
|
for.end17:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: --- !Missed
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Pass: loop-interchange
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Name: Dependence
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Function: test02
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Args:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: - String: Cannot interchange loops due to dependences.
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ...
|
|
|
|
; DELIN: --- !Missed
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Pass: loop-interchange
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Name: UnsupportedInsBetweenInduction
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Function: test02
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Args:
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: - String: Found unsupported instruction between induction variable increment and branch.
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: ...
|
|
|
|
;;-----------------------------------Test case 03-------------------------------
|
|
;; Test to make sure we can handle output dependencies.
|
|
;;
|
|
;; for (int i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
|
|
;; for(int j = 0; j < 3; ++j) {
|
|
;; A[j][i] = i;
|
|
;; A[j][i+1] = j;
|
|
;; }
|
|
|
|
@A10 = local_unnamed_addr global [3 x [3 x i32]] zeroinitializer, align 16
|
|
|
|
define void @test03() {
|
|
entry:
|
|
br label %for.cond1.preheader
|
|
|
|
for.cond.loopexit: ; preds = %for.body4
|
|
%exitcond28 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next27, 2
|
|
br i1 %exitcond28, label %for.cond1.preheader, label %for.cond.cleanup
|
|
|
|
for.cond1.preheader: ; preds = %for.cond.loopexit, %entry
|
|
%indvars.iv26 = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvars.iv.next27, %for.cond.loopexit ]
|
|
%indvars.iv.next27 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv26, 1
|
|
br label %for.body4
|
|
|
|
for.cond.cleanup: ; preds = %for.cond.loopexit
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
for.body4: ; preds = %for.body4, %for.cond1.preheader
|
|
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %for.cond1.preheader ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body4 ]
|
|
%arrayidx6 = getelementptr inbounds [3 x [3 x i32]], [3 x [3 x i32]]* @A10, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 %indvars.iv26
|
|
%tmp = trunc i64 %indvars.iv26 to i32
|
|
store i32 %tmp, i32* %arrayidx6, align 4
|
|
%arrayidx10 = getelementptr inbounds [3 x [3 x i32]], [3 x [3 x i32]]* @A10, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 %indvars.iv.next27
|
|
%tmp1 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
|
|
store i32 %tmp1, i32* %arrayidx10, align 4
|
|
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
|
|
%exitcond = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next, 3
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.body4, label %for.cond.loopexit
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: --- !Missed
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Pass: loop-interchange
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Name: Dependence
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Function: test03
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Args:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: - String: Cannot interchange loops due to dependences.
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ...
|
|
|
|
; DELIN: --- !Passed
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Pass: loop-interchange
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Name: Interchanged
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Function: test03
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Args:
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: - String: Loop interchanged with enclosing loop.
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: ...
|
|
|
|
;;--------------------------------------Test case 04-------------------------------------
|
|
;; Loops not tightly nested are not interchanged
|
|
;; for(int j=0;j<N;j++) {
|
|
;; B[j] = j+k;
|
|
;; for(int i=0;i<N;i++)
|
|
;; A[j][i] = A[j][i]+B[j];
|
|
;; }
|
|
|
|
define void @test04(i32 %k, i32 %N){
|
|
entry:
|
|
%cmp30 = icmp sgt i32 %N, 0
|
|
br i1 %cmp30, label %for.body.lr.ph, label %for.end17
|
|
|
|
for.body.lr.ph:
|
|
%0 = add i32 %N, -1
|
|
%1 = zext i32 %k to i64
|
|
br label %for.body
|
|
|
|
for.body:
|
|
%indvars.iv32 = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body.lr.ph ], [ %indvars.iv.next33, %for.inc15 ]
|
|
%2 = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv32, %1
|
|
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [100 x i32], [100 x i32]* @C, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv32
|
|
%3 = trunc i64 %2 to i32
|
|
store i32 %3, i32* %arrayidx
|
|
br label %for.body3
|
|
|
|
for.body3:
|
|
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 0, %for.body ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body3 ]
|
|
%arrayidx7 = getelementptr inbounds [100 x [100 x i32]], [100 x [100 x i32]]* @A, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv32, i64 %indvars.iv
|
|
%4 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx7
|
|
%add10 = add nsw i32 %3, %4
|
|
store i32 %add10, i32* %arrayidx7
|
|
%indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
|
|
%lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv to i32
|
|
%exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %0
|
|
br i1 %exitcond, label %for.inc15, label %for.body3
|
|
|
|
for.inc15:
|
|
%indvars.iv.next33 = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv32, 1
|
|
%lftr.wideiv35 = trunc i64 %indvars.iv32 to i32
|
|
%exitcond36 = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv35, %0
|
|
br i1 %exitcond36, label %for.end17, label %for.body
|
|
|
|
for.end17:
|
|
ret void
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
; CHECK: --- !Missed
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Pass: loop-interchange
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Name: Dependence
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Function: test04
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: Args:
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: - String: Cannot interchange loops due to dependences.
|
|
; CHECK-NEXT: ...
|
|
|
|
; DELIN: --- !Missed
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Pass: loop-interchange
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Name: NotTightlyNested
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Function: test04
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: Args:
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: - String: Cannot interchange loops because they are not tightly nested.
|
|
; DELIN-NEXT: ...
|