8331f75e28
Summary: The majority of tests in LLVM projects are using - instead of _ in the name, i.e. `check-something.test` is preferred over `check_something.test`. It makes sense for us to adopt the same naming scheme for our future tests and to rename existing ones. (cherry picked from FBD32185879)
26 lines
861 B
Plaintext
26 lines
861 B
Plaintext
# Check that fallthrough blocks are handled properly.
|
|
|
|
RUN: %clang %cflags %S/Inputs/sctc_bug4.s -o %t
|
|
RUN: llvm-bolt %t -o /dev/null \
|
|
RUN: -funcs=test_func -print-sctc -sequential-disassembly 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
CHECK: .Ltmp2 (3 instructions, align : 1)
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: CFI State : 0
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: Predecessors: .LFT1
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: 00000024: cmpq $0x20, %rsi
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: 00000028: ja dummy # TAILCALL {{.*}}# CTCTakenCount: 0
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: 0000002a: jmp .Ltmp4
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: Successors: .Ltmp4
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: CFI State: 0
|
|
|
|
CHECK: .Ltmp1 (2 instructions, align : 1)
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: CFI State : 0
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: Predecessors: .LFT0
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: 0000002c: xorq %r11, %rax
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: 0000002f: retq
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: CFI State: 0
|
|
|
|
CHECK: .Ltmp4 (4 instructions, align : 1)
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: CFI State : 0
|
|
CHECK-NEXT: Predecessors: .Ltmp2
|