31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
50 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
50 lines
1.1 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11
|
|
// <experimental/type_traits>
|
|
|
|
#include <experimental/type_traits>
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
namespace ex = std::experimental;
|
|
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
using callFoo = decltype(std::declval<T&>().Foo());
|
|
|
|
struct yesFoo {
|
|
int Foo() { return 0; }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct noFoo {
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct wrongFoo {
|
|
std::string Foo() { return ""; }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct convertibleFoo {
|
|
long Foo() { return 0; }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename T, typename Res>
|
|
void test() {
|
|
static_assert( std::is_same<Res, typename ex::detected_t<callFoo, T>>::value, "" );
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**) {
|
|
test<yesFoo, int>();
|
|
test<noFoo, ex::nonesuch>(); // lookup failure returns nonesuch
|
|
test<wrongFoo, std::string>();
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|