31cbe0f240
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned. As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do. This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
43 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
43 lines
1.4 KiB
C++
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14
|
|
// type_traits
|
|
|
|
// template<class B> struct negation; // C++17
|
|
// template<class B>
|
|
// constexpr bool negation_v = negation<B>::value; // C++17
|
|
|
|
#include <type_traits>
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
struct True { static constexpr bool value = true; };
|
|
struct False { static constexpr bool value = false; };
|
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
|
{
|
|
static_assert (!std::negation<std::true_type >::value, "" );
|
|
static_assert ( std::negation<std::false_type>::value, "" );
|
|
|
|
static_assert (!std::negation_v<std::true_type >, "" );
|
|
static_assert ( std::negation_v<std::false_type>, "" );
|
|
|
|
static_assert (!std::negation<True >::value, "" );
|
|
static_assert ( std::negation<False>::value, "" );
|
|
|
|
static_assert (!std::negation_v<True >, "" );
|
|
static_assert ( std::negation_v<False>, "" );
|
|
|
|
static_assert ( std::negation<std::negation<std::true_type >>::value, "" );
|
|
static_assert (!std::negation<std::negation<std::false_type>>::value, "" );
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|