Files
clang-p2996/lld/test/ELF/ppc64-undefined-weak.s
Fangrui Song 53b59fdc52 [ELF][PPC64] Fix assertion failure for branches to hidden undefined weak for -no-pie
Reported by Stefan Pintilie in D119773.

For a branch to a hidden undefined weak symbol, there is an
`assert(sym->getVA());` failure in PPC64LongBranchTargetSection::writeTo for a
-no-pie link. The root cause is that we unnecessarily create the thunk for the
-no-pie link.

Fix this by changing the condition to just `s.isUndefined()`. See the inline
comment.

Rename ppc64-weak-undef-call.s to ppc64-undefined-weak.s to be consistent with
other architectures.

Reviewed By: sfertile, stefanp

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119787
2022-02-15 12:57:27 -08:00

41 lines
1.2 KiB
ArmAsm

# REQUIRES: ppc
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=powerpc64le %s -o %t.o
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o %t
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d --no-show-raw-insn %t | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PDE
# RUN: ld.lld -pie %t.o -o %t
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d --no-show-raw-insn %t | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PIC
# RUN: ld.lld -shared %t.o -o %t.so
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d --no-show-raw-insn %t.so | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PIC
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=powerpc64 %s -o %t.o
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o %t
# RUN: llvm-objdump -d --no-show-raw-insn %t | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PDE
## Branches to an undefined weak symbol need a thunk iff a dynamic relocation is
## produced. undefweak2 is hidden and does not need a dynamic relocation, so we
## suppress the thunk. undefweak1 needs a thunk iff -pie or -shared.
# PDE-LABEL: <_start>:
# PDE-NEXT: bl {{.*}} <_start>
# PDE-NEXT: nop
# PDE-NEXT: bl {{.*}} <_start+0x8>
# PDE-NEXT: nop
# PIC-LABEL: <_start>:
# PIC-NEXT: bl {{.*}} <__plt_undefweak1>
# PIC-NEXT: ld 2, 24(1)
# PIC-NEXT: bl {{.*}} <_start+0x8>
# PIC-NEXT: nop
.text
.global _start
_start:
bl undefweak1
nop
bl undefweak2
nop
.weak undefweak1, undefweak2
.hidden undefweak2