Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/Transforms/BDCE/invalidate-assumptions.ll
Bjorn Pettersson 3f8027fb67 [test] Update some test cases to use -passes when specifying the pipeline
This updates transform test cases for
  ADCE
  AddDiscriminators
  AggressiveInstCombine
  AlignmentFromAssumptions
  ArgumentPromotion
  BDCE
  CalledValuePropagation
  DCE
  Reg2Mem
  WholeProgramDevirt
to use the -passes syntax when specifying the pipeline.

Given that LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER isn't set to off (which is
a deprecated feature) the updated test cases already used the new
pass manager, but they were using the legacy syntax when specifying
the passes to run. This patch can be seen as a step toward deprecating
that interface.

This patch also removes some redundant RUN lines. Here I am
referring to test cases that had multiple RUN lines verifying both
the legacy "-passname" syntax and the new "-passes=passname" syntax.
Since we switched the default pass manager to "new PM" both RUN lines
have verified the new PM version of the pass (more or less wasting
time running the same test twice), unless LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER
is set to "off". It is assumed that it is enough to run these tests
with the new pass manager now.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108472
2021-09-29 21:51:08 +02:00

96 lines
3.4 KiB
LLVM

; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py
; RUN: opt -passes=bdce %s -S | FileCheck %s
; The 'nuw' on the subtract allows us to deduce that %setbit is not demanded.
; But if we change that value to '0', then the 'nuw' is no longer valid. If we don't
; remove the 'nuw', another pass (-instcombine) may make a transform based on an
; that incorrect assumption and we can miscompile:
; https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33695
define i1 @PR33695(i1 %b, i8 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @PR33695(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LITTLE_NUMBER:%.*]] = zext i1 [[B:%.*]] to i8
; CHECK-NEXT: [[BIG_NUMBER:%.*]] = shl i8 0, 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i8 [[BIG_NUMBER]], [[LITTLE_NUMBER]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TRUNC:%.*]] = trunc i8 [[SUB]] to i1
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[TRUNC]]
;
%setbit = or i8 %x, 64
%little_number = zext i1 %b to i8
%big_number = shl i8 %setbit, 1
%sub = sub nuw i8 %big_number, %little_number
%trunc = trunc i8 %sub to i1
ret i1 %trunc
}
; Similar to above, but now with more no-wrap.
; https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34037
define i64 @PR34037(i64 %m, i32 %r, i64 %j, i1 %b, i32 %k, i64 %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @PR34037(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SHL:%.*]] = shl i64 0, 29
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CONV1:%.*]] = select i1 [[B:%.*]], i64 7, i64 0
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i64 [[SHL]], [[CONV1]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CONV2:%.*]] = zext i32 [[K:%.*]] to i64
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MUL:%.*]] = mul i64 [[SUB]], [[CONV2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CONV4:%.*]] = and i64 [[P:%.*]], 65535
; CHECK-NEXT: [[AND5:%.*]] = and i64 [[MUL]], [[CONV4]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i64 [[AND5]]
;
%conv = zext i32 %r to i64
%and = and i64 %m, %conv
%neg = xor i64 %and, 34359738367
%or = or i64 %j, %neg
%shl = shl i64 %or, 29
%conv1 = select i1 %b, i64 7, i64 0
%sub = sub nuw nsw i64 %shl, %conv1
%conv2 = zext i32 %k to i64
%mul = mul nsw i64 %sub, %conv2
%conv4 = and i64 %p, 65535
%and5 = and i64 %mul, %conv4
ret i64 %and5
}
; This is a manufactured example based on the 1st test to prove that the
; assumption-killing algorithm stops at the call. Ie, it does not remove
; nsw/nuw from the 'add' because a call demands all bits of its argument.
declare i1 @foo(i1)
define i1 @poison_on_call_user_is_ok(i1 %b, i8 %x) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @poison_on_call_user_is_ok(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[LITTLE_NUMBER:%.*]] = zext i1 [[B:%.*]] to i8
; CHECK-NEXT: [[BIG_NUMBER:%.*]] = shl i8 0, 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i8 [[BIG_NUMBER]], [[LITTLE_NUMBER]]
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TRUNC:%.*]] = trunc i8 [[SUB]] to i1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[CALL_RESULT:%.*]] = call i1 @foo(i1 [[TRUNC]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[ADD:%.*]] = add nuw nsw i1 [[CALL_RESULT]], true
; CHECK-NEXT: [[MUL:%.*]] = mul i1 [[TRUNC]], [[ADD]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i1 [[MUL]]
;
%setbit = or i8 %x, 64
%little_number = zext i1 %b to i8
%big_number = shl i8 %setbit, 1
%sub = sub nuw i8 %big_number, %little_number
%trunc = trunc i8 %sub to i1
%call_result = call i1 @foo(i1 %trunc)
%add = add nsw nuw i1 %call_result, 1
%mul = mul i1 %trunc, %add
ret i1 %mul
}
; We were asserting that all users of a trivialized integer-type instruction were
; also integer-typed, but that's too strong. The alloca has a pointer-type result.
define void @PR34179(i32* %a) {
; CHECK-LABEL: @PR34179(
; CHECK-NEXT: [[T0:%.*]] = load volatile i32, i32* [[A:%.*]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
;
%t0 = load volatile i32, i32* %a
%vla = alloca i32, i32 %t0
ret void
}