diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
20 lines
624 B
Objective-C
20 lines
624 B
Objective-C
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
|
|
int @interface bla ; // expected-error {{cannot combine with previous 'int' declaration specifier}}
|
|
@end
|
|
|
|
typedef float CGFloat;
|
|
@interface XNSNumber
|
|
+ (XNSNumber *) numberWithCGFloat : (CGFloat) float; // expected-error {{expected identifier}} \
|
|
// expected-error {{expected ';' after method prototype}}
|
|
@end
|
|
|
|
// rdar: // 7822196
|
|
@interface A
|
|
(void) x; // expected-error {{method type specifier must start with '-' or '+'}}
|
|
(int)im; // expected-error {{method type specifier must start with '-' or '+'}} \
|
|
- ok;
|
|
@end
|
|
|
|
|