destructors. We previously tried to patch up the exception specification after completing the class, which went wrong when the exception specification was needed within the class body (in particular, by a friend redeclaration of the destructor in a nested class). We now mark the destructor as having a not-yet-computed exception specification immediately after creating it. This requires delaying various checks against the exception specification (where we'd previously have just got the wrong exception specification, and now find we have an exception specification that we can't compute yet) when those checks fire while the class is being defined. This also exposed an issue that we were missing a CodeSynthesisContext for computation of exception specifications (otherwise we'd fail to make the module containing the definition of the class visible when computing its members' exception specs). Adding that incidentally also gives us a diagnostic quality improvement. This has also exposed an pre-existing problem: making the exception specification evaluation context a non-SFINAE context (as it should be) results in a bootstrap failure; PR38850 filed for this. llvm-svn: 341499
151 lines
5.1 KiB
C++
151 lines
5.1 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -fcxx-exceptions -verify -std=c++11 -Wall -Wno-unused-local-typedefs %s
|
|
|
|
template<bool b> struct ExceptionIf { static int f(); };
|
|
template<> struct ExceptionIf<false> { typedef int f; };
|
|
|
|
// The exception specification of a defaulted default constructor depends on
|
|
// the contents of in-class member initializers. However, the in-class member
|
|
// initializers can depend on the exception specification of the constructor,
|
|
// since the class is considered complete within them. We reject any such cases.
|
|
namespace InClassInitializers {
|
|
// Noexcept::Noexcept() is implicitly declared as noexcept(false), because it
|
|
// directly invokes ThrowSomething(). However...
|
|
//
|
|
// If noexcept(Noexcept()) is false, then Noexcept() is a constant expression,
|
|
// so noexcept(Noexcept()) is true. But if noexcept(Noexcept()) is true, then
|
|
// Noexcept::Noexcept is not declared constexpr, therefore noexcept(Noexcept())
|
|
// is false.
|
|
bool ThrowSomething() noexcept(false);
|
|
struct ConstExpr { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'b' needed}}
|
|
bool b = // expected-note {{declared here}}
|
|
noexcept(ConstExpr()) && ThrowSomething(); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Much more obviously broken: we can't parse the initializer without already
|
|
// knowing whether it produces a noexcept expression.
|
|
struct TemplateArg { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}
|
|
int n = // expected-note {{declared here}}
|
|
ExceptionIf<noexcept(TemplateArg())>::f(); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// And within a nested class.
|
|
struct Nested {
|
|
struct Inner { // expected-error {{default member initializer for 'n' needed}}
|
|
int n = // expected-note {{declared here}}
|
|
ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested())>::f(); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
|
|
} inner; // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct Nested2 {
|
|
struct Inner;
|
|
int n = Inner().n; // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
|
|
struct Inner { // expected-error {{initializer for 'n' needed}}
|
|
int n = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Nested2())>::f(); // expected-note {{declared here}}
|
|
} inner;
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace ExceptionSpecification {
|
|
struct Nested {
|
|
struct T {
|
|
T() noexcept(!noexcept(Nested())); // expected-note {{in evaluation of exception spec}}
|
|
} t; // expected-error{{exception specification is not available until end of class definition}}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace DefaultArgument {
|
|
struct Default {
|
|
struct T {
|
|
T(int = ExceptionIf<noexcept(Default())::f()); // expected-error {{call to implicitly-deleted default constructor}}
|
|
} t; // expected-note {{has no default constructor}}
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
namespace ImplicitDtorExceptionSpec {
|
|
struct A {
|
|
virtual ~A();
|
|
|
|
struct Inner {
|
|
~Inner() throw();
|
|
};
|
|
Inner inner;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct B {
|
|
virtual ~B() {} // expected-note {{here}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct C : B {
|
|
virtual ~C() {}
|
|
A a;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct D : B {
|
|
~D(); // expected-error {{more lax than base}}
|
|
struct E {
|
|
~E();
|
|
struct F {
|
|
~F() throw(A);
|
|
} f;
|
|
} e;
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct nothrow_t {} nothrow;
|
|
void *operator new(decltype(sizeof(0)), nothrow_t) noexcept;
|
|
|
|
namespace PotentiallyConstructed {
|
|
template<bool NE> struct A {
|
|
A() noexcept(NE);
|
|
A(const A&) noexcept(NE);
|
|
A(A&&) noexcept(NE);
|
|
A &operator=(const A&) noexcept(NE);
|
|
A &operator=(A&&) noexcept(NE);
|
|
~A() noexcept(NE);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template<bool NE> struct B : virtual A<NE> {};
|
|
|
|
template<bool NE> struct C : virtual A<NE> {
|
|
virtual void f() = 0; // expected-note 2{{unimplemented}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template<bool NE> struct D final : C<NE> {
|
|
void f();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template<typename T, bool A, bool B, bool C, bool D, bool E, bool F> void check() {
|
|
T *p = nullptr;
|
|
T &a = *p;
|
|
static_assert(noexcept(a = a) == D, "");
|
|
static_assert(noexcept(a = static_cast<T&&>(a)) == E, "");
|
|
static_assert(noexcept(delete &a) == F, "");
|
|
|
|
// These are last because the first failure here causes instantiation to bail out.
|
|
static_assert(noexcept(new (nothrow) T()) == A, ""); // expected-error 2{{abstract}}
|
|
static_assert(noexcept(new (nothrow) T(a)) == B, "");
|
|
static_assert(noexcept(new (nothrow) T(static_cast<T&&>(a))) == C, "");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template void check<A<false>, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>();
|
|
template void check<A<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>();
|
|
template void check<B<false>, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>();
|
|
template void check<B<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>();
|
|
template void check<C<false>, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0>(); // expected-note {{instantiation}}
|
|
template void check<C<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>(); // expected-note {{instantiation}}
|
|
template void check<D<false>, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0>();
|
|
template void check<D<true >, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1>();
|
|
|
|
// ... the above trick doesn't work for this case...
|
|
struct Cfalse : virtual A<false> {
|
|
virtual void f() = 0;
|
|
|
|
Cfalse() noexcept;
|
|
Cfalse(const Cfalse&) noexcept;
|
|
Cfalse(Cfalse&&) noexcept;
|
|
};
|
|
Cfalse::Cfalse() noexcept = default;
|
|
Cfalse::Cfalse(const Cfalse&) noexcept = default;
|
|
Cfalse::Cfalse(Cfalse&&) noexcept = default;
|
|
}
|