7981004eb7
For 'x::template y', consistently give a "no member named 'y' in 'x'" diagnostic if there is no such member, and give a 'template keyword not followed by a template' name error if there is such a member but it's not a template. In the latter case, add a note pointing at the non-template. Don't suggest inserting a 'template' keyword in 'X::Y<' if X is dependent if the lookup of X::Y was actually not a dependent lookup and found only non-templates. llvm-svn: 332076
46 lines
921 B
C++
46 lines
921 B
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
|
|
using nullptr_t = decltype(nullptr);
|
|
|
|
template<typename T>
|
|
struct Base {
|
|
T inner;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int z;
|
|
|
|
template<typename T>
|
|
struct X : Base<T> {
|
|
static int z;
|
|
|
|
template<int U>
|
|
struct Inner {
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
bool f(T other) {
|
|
// A pair of comparisons; 'inner' is a dependent name so can't be assumed
|
|
// to be a template.
|
|
return this->inner < other > ::z;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void use_x(X<int> x) { x.f(0); }
|
|
|
|
template<typename T>
|
|
struct Y {
|
|
static int z;
|
|
|
|
template<int U>
|
|
struct Inner : Y { // expected-note {{declared here}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
bool f(T other) {
|
|
// We can determine that 'inner' does not exist at parse time, so can
|
|
// perform typo correction in this case.
|
|
return this->inner<other>::z; // expected-error {{no template named 'inner' in 'Y<T>'; did you mean 'Inner'?}}
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct Q { constexpr operator int() { return 0; } };
|
|
void use_y(Y<Q> x) { x.f(Q()); }
|