Files
clang-p2996/polly/test/ScopInfo/granularity_same_name.ll
Michael Kruse 9cfb0ac223 [ScopBuilder] Revise statement naming when there are multiple statements per BB.
The goal is to have -polly-stmt-granularity=bb and
-polly-stmt-granularity=scalar-indep to have the same names if there is
just one statement per basic block.

This fixes a fluke when Polybench's jacobi-2d is optimized differently
depending on the -polly-stmt-granularity option, although both options
create the same SCoP, just with different statement names.

The new naming scheme is:

With -polly-use-llvm-names=0:
Stmt<BBIdx as decimal><Idx within BB as letter>

With -polly-use-llvm-names=1:
Stmt_BBName_<Idx within BB as letter>

The <Idx within BB> suffix is omitted for the main statement of a BB. The
main statement is either the one containing the first store or call
(those cannot be removed by the simplifyer), or if there is no such
instruction, the first. If after simplification there is just a single
statement left, it should be the main statement and have the same names as
with -polly-stmt-granularity=bb.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42136

llvm-svn: 322852
2018-01-18 15:15:50 +00:00

50 lines
1.6 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-stmt-granularity=bb -polly-use-llvm-names=0 -polly-scops -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s -match-full-lines -check-prefix=IDX
; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-stmt-granularity=bb -polly-use-llvm-names=1 -polly-scops -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s -match-full-lines -check-prefix=BB
; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-stmt-granularity=scalar-indep -polly-use-llvm-names=0 -polly-scops -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s -match-full-lines -check-prefix=IDX
; RUN: opt %loadPolly -polly-stmt-granularity=scalar-indep -polly-use-llvm-names=1 -polly-scops -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s -match-full-lines -check-prefix=BB
;
; Check that the statement has the same name, regardless of how the
; basic block is split into multiple statements.
; Note that %unrelatedA and %unrelatedB can be put into separate
; statements, but are removed because those have no side-effects.
;
; for (int j = 0; j < n; j += 1) {
; body:
; double unrelatedA = 21.0 + 21.0;
; A[0] = 0.0;
; double unrelatedB = 21.0 + 21.0;
; }
;
define void @func(i32 %n, double* noalias nonnull %A) {
entry:
br label %for
for:
%j = phi i32 [0, %entry], [%j.inc, %inc]
%j.cmp = icmp slt i32 %j, %n
br i1 %j.cmp, label %body, label %exit
body:
%unrelatedA = fadd double 21.0, 21.0
store double 0.0, double* %A
%unrelatedB = fadd double 21.0, 21.0
br label %inc
inc:
%j.inc = add nuw nsw i32 %j, 1
br label %for
exit:
br label %return
return:
ret void
}
; IDX: Statements {
; IDX-NEXT: Stmt1
; BB: Statements {
; BB-NEXT: Stmt_body