Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/CodeGen/Thumb/stack-guard-xo.ll
Ties Stuij 84f888ca82 [ARM] don't emit constant pool for Thumb1 XO/stack guard combo
Currently for armv6-m and armv8-m.baseline, we emit constant pool code when we
use execute-only (XO) in combination with stack guards.

XO is a new feature for armv6-m, and this patch is part of a series of patches
that substitutes constant pool generation with the tMOVi32imm equivalent.

However XO for armv8-m.baseline has been available for about 6 years, and so
for armv8-m.baseline this is a bugfix.

Reviewed By: simonwallis2, olista01

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D155170
2023-07-19 13:51:43 +01:00

101 lines
3.4 KiB
LLVM

; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 3
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m | FileCheck %s
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv6m -mattr=+execute-only | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=V6M
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=thumbv8m.base -mattr=+execute-only | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=V8MBASE
define dso_local i32 @main() #0 {
; CHECK-LABEL: main:
; CHECK: @ %bb.0: @ %entry
; CHECK-NEXT: push {r7, lr}
; CHECK-NEXT: sub sp, #24
; CHECK-NEXT: movs r0, #0
; CHECK-NEXT: str r0, [sp, #4]
; CHECK-NEXT: ldr r0, .LCPI0_0
; CHECK-NEXT: ldr r0, [r0]
; CHECK-NEXT: str r0, [sp, #20]
; CHECK-NEXT: add r0, sp, #8
; CHECK-NEXT: ldrb r0, [r0]
; CHECK-NEXT: ldr r1, [sp, #20]
; CHECK-NEXT: ldr r2, .LCPI0_0
; CHECK-NEXT: ldr r2, [r2]
; CHECK-NEXT: cmp r2, r1
; CHECK-NEXT: bne .LBB0_2
; CHECK-NEXT: @ %bb.1: @ %entry
; CHECK-NEXT: add sp, #24
; CHECK-NEXT: pop {r7, pc}
; CHECK-NEXT: .LBB0_2: @ %entry
; CHECK-NEXT: bl __stack_chk_fail
; CHECK-NEXT: .p2align 2
; CHECK-NEXT: @ %bb.3:
; CHECK-NEXT: .LCPI0_0:
; CHECK-NEXT: .long __stack_chk_guard
;
; V6M-LABEL: main:
; V6M: @ %bb.0: @ %entry
; V6M-NEXT: push {r7, lr}
; V6M-NEXT: sub sp, #24
; V6M-NEXT: movs r0, #0
; V6M-NEXT: str r0, [sp, #4]
; V6M-NEXT: movs r0, :upper8_15:__stack_chk_guard
; V6M-NEXT: lsls r0, r0, #8
; V6M-NEXT: adds r0, :upper0_7:__stack_chk_guard
; V6M-NEXT: lsls r0, r0, #8
; V6M-NEXT: adds r0, :lower8_15:__stack_chk_guard
; V6M-NEXT: lsls r0, r0, #8
; V6M-NEXT: adds r0, :lower0_7:__stack_chk_guard
; V6M-NEXT: ldr r0, [r0]
; V6M-NEXT: str r0, [sp, #20]
; V6M-NEXT: add r0, sp, #8
; V6M-NEXT: ldrb r0, [r0]
; V6M-NEXT: ldr r1, [sp, #20]
; V6M-NEXT: movs r2, :upper8_15:__stack_chk_guard
; V6M-NEXT: lsls r2, r2, #8
; V6M-NEXT: adds r2, :upper0_7:__stack_chk_guard
; V6M-NEXT: lsls r2, r2, #8
; V6M-NEXT: adds r2, :lower8_15:__stack_chk_guard
; V6M-NEXT: lsls r2, r2, #8
; V6M-NEXT: adds r2, :lower0_7:__stack_chk_guard
; V6M-NEXT: ldr r2, [r2]
; V6M-NEXT: cmp r2, r1
; V6M-NEXT: bne .LBB0_2
; V6M-NEXT: @ %bb.1: @ %entry
; V6M-NEXT: add sp, #24
; V6M-NEXT: pop {r7, pc}
; V6M-NEXT: .LBB0_2: @ %entry
; V6M-NEXT: bl __stack_chk_fail
;
; V8MBASE-LABEL: main:
; V8MBASE: @ %bb.0: @ %entry
; V8MBASE-NEXT: push {r7, lr}
; V8MBASE-NEXT: sub sp, #24
; V8MBASE-NEXT: movs r0, #0
; V8MBASE-NEXT: str r0, [sp, #4]
; V8MBASE-NEXT: movw r0, :lower16:__stack_chk_guard
; V8MBASE-NEXT: movt r0, :upper16:__stack_chk_guard
; V8MBASE-NEXT: ldr r0, [r0]
; V8MBASE-NEXT: str r0, [sp, #20]
; V8MBASE-NEXT: add r0, sp, #8
; V8MBASE-NEXT: ldrb r0, [r0]
; V8MBASE-NEXT: ldr r1, [sp, #20]
; V8MBASE-NEXT: movw r2, :lower16:__stack_chk_guard
; V8MBASE-NEXT: movt r2, :upper16:__stack_chk_guard
; V8MBASE-NEXT: ldr r2, [r2]
; V8MBASE-NEXT: cmp r2, r1
; V8MBASE-NEXT: bne .LBB0_2
; V8MBASE-NEXT: @ %bb.1: @ %entry
; V8MBASE-NEXT: add sp, #24
; V8MBASE-NEXT: pop {r7, pc}
; V8MBASE-NEXT: .LBB0_2: @ %entry
; V8MBASE-NEXT: bl __stack_chk_fail
entry:
%retval = alloca i32, align 4
%buffer = alloca [9 x i8], align 1
store i32 0, ptr %retval, align 4
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [9 x i8], ptr %buffer, i32 0, i32 0
%0 = load i8, ptr %arrayidx, align 1
%conv = zext i8 %0 to i32
ret i32 %conv
}
attributes #0 = { ssp "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" }