Files
clang-p2996/clang/lib/CodeGen
JF Bastien 6508929da9 CodeGen: use non-zero memset when possible for automatic variables
Summary:
Right now automatic variables are either initialized with bzero followed by a few stores, or memcpy'd from a synthesized global. We end up encountering a fair amount of code where memcpy of non-zero byte patterns would be better than memcpy from a global because it touches less memory and generates a smaller binary. The optimizer could reason about this, but it's not really worth it when clang already knows.

This code could definitely be more clever but I'm not sure it's worth it. In particular we could track a histogram of bytes seen and figure out (as we do with bzero) if a memset could be followed by a handful of stores. Similarly, we could tune the heuristics for GlobalSize, but using the same as for bzero seems conservatively OK for now.

<rdar://problem/42563091>

Reviewers: dexonsmith

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49771

llvm-svn: 337887
2018-07-25 04:29:03 +00:00
..
2018-03-20 22:02:57 +00:00
2018-02-07 22:15:33 +00:00
2018-07-20 08:19:20 +00:00
2018-03-20 22:02:57 +00:00
2018-07-11 19:51:40 +00:00
2018-07-19 18:59:38 +00:00
2018-04-06 15:14:32 +00:00

IRgen optimization opportunities.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

The common pattern of
--
short x; // or char, etc
(x == 10)
--
generates an zext/sext of x which can easily be avoided.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

Bitfields accesses can be shifted to simplify masking and sign
extension. For example, if the bitfield width is 8 and it is
appropriately aligned then is is a lot shorter to just load the char
directly.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

It may be worth avoiding creation of alloca's for formal arguments
for the common situation where the argument is never written to or has
its address taken. The idea would be to begin generating code by using
the argument directly and if its address is taken or it is stored to
then generate the alloca and patch up the existing code.

In theory, the same optimization could be a win for block local
variables as long as the declaration dominates all statements in the
block.

NOTE: The main case we care about this for is for -O0 -g compile time
performance, and in that scenario we will need to emit the alloca
anyway currently to emit proper debug info. So this is blocked by
being able to emit debug information which refers to an LLVM
temporary, not an alloca.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

We should try and avoid generating basic blocks which only contain
jumps. At -O0, this penalizes us all the way from IRgen (malloc &
instruction overhead), all the way down through code generation and
assembly time.

On 176.gcc:expr.ll, it looks like over 12% of basic blocks are just
direct branches!

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//