I missed these two in my last patch as the two patches crossed in review, so correct this now.
200 lines
7.3 KiB
C++
200 lines
7.3 KiB
C++
//===--- SemaOpenACC.cpp - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs -------===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
/// \file
|
|
/// This file implements semantic analysis for OpenACC constructs and
|
|
/// clauses.
|
|
///
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "clang/Sema/SemaOpenACC.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/StmtOpenACC.h"
|
|
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticSema.h"
|
|
#include "clang/Sema/Sema.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace clang;
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
bool diagnoseConstructAppertainment(SemaOpenACC &S, OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
|
|
SourceLocation StartLoc, bool IsStmt) {
|
|
switch (K) {
|
|
default:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Invalid:
|
|
// Nothing to do here, both invalid and unimplemented don't really need to
|
|
// do anything.
|
|
break;
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
|
|
if (!IsStmt)
|
|
return S.Diag(StartLoc, diag::err_acc_construct_appertainment) << K;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool doesClauseApplyToDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind DirectiveKind,
|
|
OpenACCClauseKind ClauseKind) {
|
|
switch (ClauseKind) {
|
|
// FIXME: For each clause as we implement them, we can add the
|
|
// 'legalization' list here.
|
|
case OpenACCClauseKind::Default:
|
|
switch (DirectiveKind) {
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::ParallelLoop:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::SerialLoop:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::KernelsLoop:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Data:
|
|
return true;
|
|
default:
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
default:
|
|
// Do nothing so we can go to the 'unimplemented' diagnostic instead.
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
llvm_unreachable("Invalid clause kind");
|
|
}
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
|
|
SemaOpenACC::SemaOpenACC(Sema &S) : SemaBase(S) {}
|
|
|
|
OpenACCClause *
|
|
SemaOpenACC::ActOnClause(ArrayRef<const OpenACCClause *> ExistingClauses,
|
|
OpenACCParsedClause &Clause) {
|
|
if (Clause.getClauseKind() == OpenACCClauseKind::Invalid)
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
|
|
// Diagnose that we don't support this clause on this directive.
|
|
if (!doesClauseApplyToDirective(Clause.getDirectiveKind(),
|
|
Clause.getClauseKind())) {
|
|
Diag(Clause.getBeginLoc(), diag::err_acc_clause_appertainment)
|
|
<< Clause.getDirectiveKind() << Clause.getClauseKind();
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
switch (Clause.getClauseKind()) {
|
|
case OpenACCClauseKind::Default: {
|
|
// Restrictions only properly implemented on 'compute' constructs, and
|
|
// 'compute' constructs are the only construct that can do anything with
|
|
// this yet, so skip/treat as unimplemented in this case.
|
|
if (Clause.getDirectiveKind() != OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel &&
|
|
Clause.getDirectiveKind() != OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial &&
|
|
Clause.getDirectiveKind() != OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels)
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
// Don't add an invalid clause to the AST.
|
|
if (Clause.getDefaultClauseKind() == OpenACCDefaultClauseKind::Invalid)
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
|
|
// OpenACC 3.3, Section 2.5.4:
|
|
// At most one 'default' clause may appear, and it must have a value of
|
|
// either 'none' or 'present'.
|
|
// Second half of the sentence is diagnosed during parsing.
|
|
auto Itr = llvm::find_if(ExistingClauses, [](const OpenACCClause *C) {
|
|
return C->getClauseKind() == OpenACCClauseKind::Default;
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
if (Itr != ExistingClauses.end()) {
|
|
Diag(Clause.getBeginLoc(),
|
|
diag::err_acc_duplicate_clause_disallowed)
|
|
<< Clause.getDirectiveKind() << Clause.getClauseKind();
|
|
Diag((*Itr)->getBeginLoc(), diag::note_acc_previous_clause_here);
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return OpenACCDefaultClause::Create(
|
|
getASTContext(), Clause.getDefaultClauseKind(), Clause.getBeginLoc(),
|
|
Clause.getLParenLoc(), Clause.getEndLoc());
|
|
}
|
|
default:
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Diag(Clause.getBeginLoc(), diag::warn_acc_clause_unimplemented)
|
|
<< Clause.getClauseKind();
|
|
return nullptr;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void SemaOpenACC::ActOnConstruct(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
|
|
SourceLocation StartLoc) {
|
|
switch (K) {
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Invalid:
|
|
// Nothing to do here, an invalid kind has nothing we can check here. We
|
|
// want to continue parsing clauses as far as we can, so we will just
|
|
// ensure that we can still work and don't check any construct-specific
|
|
// rules anywhere.
|
|
break;
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
|
|
// Nothing to do here, there is no real legalization that needs to happen
|
|
// here as these constructs do not take any arguments.
|
|
break;
|
|
default:
|
|
Diag(StartLoc, diag::warn_acc_construct_unimplemented) << K;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool SemaOpenACC::ActOnStartStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
|
|
SourceLocation StartLoc) {
|
|
return diagnoseConstructAppertainment(*this, K, StartLoc, /*IsStmt=*/true);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
StmtResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnEndStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
|
|
SourceLocation StartLoc,
|
|
SourceLocation EndLoc,
|
|
ArrayRef<OpenACCClause *> Clauses,
|
|
StmtResult AssocStmt) {
|
|
switch (K) {
|
|
default:
|
|
return StmtEmpty();
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Invalid:
|
|
return StmtError();
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
|
|
// TODO OpenACC: Add clauses to the construct here.
|
|
return OpenACCComputeConstruct::Create(
|
|
getASTContext(), K, StartLoc, EndLoc, Clauses,
|
|
AssocStmt.isUsable() ? AssocStmt.get() : nullptr);
|
|
}
|
|
llvm_unreachable("Unhandled case in directive handling?");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
StmtResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnAssociatedStmt(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
|
|
StmtResult AssocStmt) {
|
|
switch (K) {
|
|
default:
|
|
llvm_unreachable("Unimplemented associated statement application");
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
|
|
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
|
|
// There really isn't any checking here that could happen. As long as we
|
|
// have a statement to associate, this should be fine.
|
|
// OpenACC 3.3 Section 6:
|
|
// Structured Block: in C or C++, an executable statement, possibly
|
|
// compound, with a single entry at the top and a single exit at the
|
|
// bottom.
|
|
// FIXME: Should we reject DeclStmt's here? The standard isn't clear, and
|
|
// an interpretation of it is to allow this and treat the initializer as
|
|
// the 'structured block'.
|
|
return AssocStmt;
|
|
}
|
|
llvm_unreachable("Invalid associated statement application");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bool SemaOpenACC::ActOnStartDeclDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
|
|
SourceLocation StartLoc) {
|
|
return diagnoseConstructAppertainment(*this, K, StartLoc, /*IsStmt=*/false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
DeclGroupRef SemaOpenACC::ActOnEndDeclDirective() { return DeclGroupRef{}; }
|