Files
clang-p2996/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenACC.cpp
erichkeane 48c5c70fdd [NFC] Update SemaRef.Diag to just Diag in OpenACC implementation
I missed these two in my last patch as the two patches crossed in
review, so correct this now.
2024-04-10 09:25:57 -07:00

200 lines
7.3 KiB
C++

//===--- SemaOpenACC.cpp - Semantic Analysis for OpenACC constructs -------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// \file
/// This file implements semantic analysis for OpenACC constructs and
/// clauses.
///
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/Sema/SemaOpenACC.h"
#include "clang/AST/StmtOpenACC.h"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticSema.h"
#include "clang/Sema/Sema.h"
using namespace clang;
namespace {
bool diagnoseConstructAppertainment(SemaOpenACC &S, OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
SourceLocation StartLoc, bool IsStmt) {
switch (K) {
default:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Invalid:
// Nothing to do here, both invalid and unimplemented don't really need to
// do anything.
break;
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
if (!IsStmt)
return S.Diag(StartLoc, diag::err_acc_construct_appertainment) << K;
break;
}
return false;
}
bool doesClauseApplyToDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind DirectiveKind,
OpenACCClauseKind ClauseKind) {
switch (ClauseKind) {
// FIXME: For each clause as we implement them, we can add the
// 'legalization' list here.
case OpenACCClauseKind::Default:
switch (DirectiveKind) {
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::ParallelLoop:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::SerialLoop:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::KernelsLoop:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Data:
return true;
default:
return false;
}
default:
// Do nothing so we can go to the 'unimplemented' diagnostic instead.
return true;
}
llvm_unreachable("Invalid clause kind");
}
} // namespace
SemaOpenACC::SemaOpenACC(Sema &S) : SemaBase(S) {}
OpenACCClause *
SemaOpenACC::ActOnClause(ArrayRef<const OpenACCClause *> ExistingClauses,
OpenACCParsedClause &Clause) {
if (Clause.getClauseKind() == OpenACCClauseKind::Invalid)
return nullptr;
// Diagnose that we don't support this clause on this directive.
if (!doesClauseApplyToDirective(Clause.getDirectiveKind(),
Clause.getClauseKind())) {
Diag(Clause.getBeginLoc(), diag::err_acc_clause_appertainment)
<< Clause.getDirectiveKind() << Clause.getClauseKind();
return nullptr;
}
switch (Clause.getClauseKind()) {
case OpenACCClauseKind::Default: {
// Restrictions only properly implemented on 'compute' constructs, and
// 'compute' constructs are the only construct that can do anything with
// this yet, so skip/treat as unimplemented in this case.
if (Clause.getDirectiveKind() != OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel &&
Clause.getDirectiveKind() != OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial &&
Clause.getDirectiveKind() != OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels)
break;
// Don't add an invalid clause to the AST.
if (Clause.getDefaultClauseKind() == OpenACCDefaultClauseKind::Invalid)
return nullptr;
// OpenACC 3.3, Section 2.5.4:
// At most one 'default' clause may appear, and it must have a value of
// either 'none' or 'present'.
// Second half of the sentence is diagnosed during parsing.
auto Itr = llvm::find_if(ExistingClauses, [](const OpenACCClause *C) {
return C->getClauseKind() == OpenACCClauseKind::Default;
});
if (Itr != ExistingClauses.end()) {
Diag(Clause.getBeginLoc(),
diag::err_acc_duplicate_clause_disallowed)
<< Clause.getDirectiveKind() << Clause.getClauseKind();
Diag((*Itr)->getBeginLoc(), diag::note_acc_previous_clause_here);
return nullptr;
}
return OpenACCDefaultClause::Create(
getASTContext(), Clause.getDefaultClauseKind(), Clause.getBeginLoc(),
Clause.getLParenLoc(), Clause.getEndLoc());
}
default:
break;
}
Diag(Clause.getBeginLoc(), diag::warn_acc_clause_unimplemented)
<< Clause.getClauseKind();
return nullptr;
}
void SemaOpenACC::ActOnConstruct(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
SourceLocation StartLoc) {
switch (K) {
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Invalid:
// Nothing to do here, an invalid kind has nothing we can check here. We
// want to continue parsing clauses as far as we can, so we will just
// ensure that we can still work and don't check any construct-specific
// rules anywhere.
break;
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
// Nothing to do here, there is no real legalization that needs to happen
// here as these constructs do not take any arguments.
break;
default:
Diag(StartLoc, diag::warn_acc_construct_unimplemented) << K;
break;
}
}
bool SemaOpenACC::ActOnStartStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
SourceLocation StartLoc) {
return diagnoseConstructAppertainment(*this, K, StartLoc, /*IsStmt=*/true);
}
StmtResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnEndStmtDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
SourceLocation StartLoc,
SourceLocation EndLoc,
ArrayRef<OpenACCClause *> Clauses,
StmtResult AssocStmt) {
switch (K) {
default:
return StmtEmpty();
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Invalid:
return StmtError();
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
// TODO OpenACC: Add clauses to the construct here.
return OpenACCComputeConstruct::Create(
getASTContext(), K, StartLoc, EndLoc, Clauses,
AssocStmt.isUsable() ? AssocStmt.get() : nullptr);
}
llvm_unreachable("Unhandled case in directive handling?");
}
StmtResult SemaOpenACC::ActOnAssociatedStmt(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
StmtResult AssocStmt) {
switch (K) {
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unimplemented associated statement application");
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Parallel:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Serial:
case OpenACCDirectiveKind::Kernels:
// There really isn't any checking here that could happen. As long as we
// have a statement to associate, this should be fine.
// OpenACC 3.3 Section 6:
// Structured Block: in C or C++, an executable statement, possibly
// compound, with a single entry at the top and a single exit at the
// bottom.
// FIXME: Should we reject DeclStmt's here? The standard isn't clear, and
// an interpretation of it is to allow this and treat the initializer as
// the 'structured block'.
return AssocStmt;
}
llvm_unreachable("Invalid associated statement application");
}
bool SemaOpenACC::ActOnStartDeclDirective(OpenACCDirectiveKind K,
SourceLocation StartLoc) {
return diagnoseConstructAppertainment(*this, K, StartLoc, /*IsStmt=*/false);
}
DeclGroupRef SemaOpenACC::ActOnEndDeclDirective() { return DeclGroupRef{}; }