f9ead46931
These are an artifact of how types are structured but serve little purpose, merely showing that the type is sugared in some way. For example, ElaboratedType's existence means struct S gets printed as 'struct S':'struct S' in the AST, which is unnecessary visual clutter. Note that skipping the second print when the types have the same string matches what we do for diagnostics, where the aka will be skipped.
47 lines
2.4 KiB
HLSL
47 lines
2.4 KiB
HLSL
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-compute -x hlsl -ast-dump -disable-llvm-passes -o - -hlsl-entry main %s | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
template<typename K, typename V>
|
|
struct Pair {
|
|
K First;
|
|
V Second;
|
|
|
|
K getFirst() {
|
|
return this.First;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
V getSecond() {
|
|
return Second;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
[numthreads(1, 1, 1)]
|
|
void main() {
|
|
Pair<int, float> Vals = {1, 2.0};
|
|
Vals.First = Vals.getFirst();
|
|
Vals.Second = Vals.getSecond();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: -CXXMethodDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <line:8:3, line:10:3> line:8:5 getFirst 'K ()' implicit-inline
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CompoundStmt 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:16, line:10:3>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-ReturnStmt 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <line:9:4, col:16>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:11, col:16> '<dependent type>' lvalue .First
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CXXThisExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:11> 'Pair<K, V>' lvalue this
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CXXMethodDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <line:12:3, line:14:3> line:12:5 getSecond 'V ()' implicit-inline
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CompoundStmt 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:17, line:14:3>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-ReturnStmt 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <line:13:5, col:12>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-MemberExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:12> 'V' lvalue .Second 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}}
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CXXThisExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:12> 'Pair<K, V>' lvalue implicit this
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: -CXXMethodDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <line:8:3, line:10:3> line:8:5 used getFirst 'int ()' implicit_instantiation implicit-inline
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CompoundStmt 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:16, line:10:3>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-ReturnStmt 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <line:9:4, col:16>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-ImplicitCastExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:11, col:16> 'int' <LValueToRValue>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-MemberExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:11, col:16> 'int' lvalue .First 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}}
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CXXThisExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:11> 'Pair<int, float>' lvalue this
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CXXMethodDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <line:12:3, line:14:3> line:12:5 used getSecond 'float ()' implicit_instantiation implicit-inline
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CompoundStmt 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:17, line:14:3>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-ReturnStmt 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <line:13:5, col:12>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-ImplicitCastExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:12> 'float' <LValueToRValue>
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-MemberExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:12> 'float' lvalue .Second 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}}
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT:-CXXThisExpr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <col:12> 'Pair<int, float>' lvalue implicit this
|