cb1654ee4b
* For `-###`, `-o %t.o` is unnecessary if we don't specifically test the output filename. * --target= is the canonical spelling. -target is a legacy spelling which unfortunately cannot be removed because there are too many uses. * -no-canonical-prefixes uses the dereferenced absolute path for the cc1 command. For most tests "-cc1" is sufficient to identify the command line, no need to specifically test the "clang" command, and -no-canonical-prefixes can removed. * --unwindlib= is the preferred spelling. -u is a short option taking a value, which means a -uwindlib= typo cannot be detected. I recommend that you take a look at linux-cross.cpp. Testing include paths and library paths in one RUN line is sometimes more readable than having separate include/library tests. Having separate RUN lines for misc features like -fdata-sections (`aix-data-sections.c`) is wasteful. It may be better testing multiple options in a single RUN command. Reviewed By: jsji Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119309
11 lines
545 B
C
11 lines
545 B
C
// Check the default rtlib for AIX.
|
|
// RUN: %clang --target=powerpc-ibm-aix -print-libgcc-file-name \
|
|
// RUN: -resource-dir=%S/Inputs/resource_dir \
|
|
// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK32 %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang --target=powerpc64-ibm-aix -print-libgcc-file-name \
|
|
// RUN: -resource-dir=%S/Inputs/resource_dir \
|
|
// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK64 %s
|
|
|
|
// CHECK32: resource_dir{{/|\\}}lib{{/|\\}}aix{{/|\\}}libclang_rt.builtins-powerpc.a
|
|
// CHECK64: resource_dir{{/|\\}}lib{{/|\\}}aix{{/|\\}}libclang_rt.builtins-powerpc64.a
|